Comrades in arms had nothing in common
Mr Ahern says the differences between Irish nationalists and unionists were “transcended by their higher, common purpose”.
The unionists went to war (against a country which a few months earlier had armed them in their revolt against the British parliament) for king and country, aka, the British empire at the height of its genocidal, world-conquering power. Nationalists joined the British army to defend the rights of small nations. Where was the common purpose in that? What was “higher” about it?