There is an alternative — why not opt for it?
Now, apparently, she has agreed that the EU can fund such research, partially at the expense of the Irish taxpayer. It is seemingly OK to support and encourage it abroad and defensively protest that it is not taking place in Ireland.
The decision to vote in favour of destructive research at the EU Council of Ministers meeting later this month has not been approved by the Dáil; neither has it been the subject of any extensive public debate.
It is also deeply disturbing that the decision falls under the remit of the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment, as if it were merely a commercial decision and not one involving life and death.
When discussing the issue, we need to stay focussed on the reality of what human embryonic stem cell research entails.
Those pushing for the research argue that it might lead to a cure of human diseases like cancer, Parkinson’s Disease, etc.
But embryo research involves the intentional destruction of a new human life at its earliest stage of development. Clearly the end in this situation cannot justify the means.
If the political will exists, the Government could instead commit itself to making the resources available for Ireland to pioneer adult stem cell research, which shows tremendous scientific potential, without the ethical concerns.
But for some reason, the Government at international meetings is characterised by its refusal to make a stand on important right to life issues as if embarrassed or indifferent to Ireland’s values.
So far, Germany, Italy, Austria and Portugal have stated their intention to vote against the research proposal at the EU council of ministers meeting. If the Government, by its vote, enables this inhuman research at EU level, it will be acting disgracefully and without a mandate.
Dr Ruth Cullen,
Pro-Life Campaign,
34, Gardiner Street Upper,
Dublin 1.
