Irish Examiner view: Restoring trust in RTÉ

'Ireland needs an independent, adequately funded RTÉ'
'Employees being asked to accept organisational change, uncertainty, and a smaller workforce will examine how the rules operate for those recruited into prominent positions. Trust cannot flourish where management asks staff to take fairness on faith.' File picture: Liam McBurney/PA

'Employees being asked to accept organisational change, uncertainty, and a smaller workforce will examine how the rules operate for those recruited into prominent positions. Trust cannot flourish where management asks staff to take fairness on faith.' File picture: Liam McBurney/PA

RTÉ cannot rebuild public trust by insisting that the public has misunderstood its explanations.

After the scandals of 2023, the broadcaster promised a different culture: Greater openness, clearer accountability, and an end to arrangements whose workings became apparent only when somebody asked awkward questions. This week’s Oireachtas hearing offered an uncomfortable reminder of how much remains to be done.

The hiring of Ger Gilroy to present the Howler Sport podcast has become the latest test of those promises. Concerned about the recruitment process, the National Union of Journalists has sought a meeting to discuss it.

The issue is neither Gilroy’s broadcasting ability nor RTÉ’s entitlement to recruit experienced people. A public service broadcaster needs talent and must be able to compete for it. But competition for talent does not relieve management of its obligation to explain how appointments are made and what public money buys.

RTÉ says Gilroy was assessed against the same weighted criteria as other candidates, although he did not submit an expression of interest himself. Its explanation is that the expressions of interest process allowed management to identify additional candidates.

That distinction may satisfy those who designed the procedure, but management should understand why it has failed to reassure those watching it unfold. Twenty internal applicants expressed interest in the role. They, and their colleagues, deserve to understand how a process advertised to staff accommodates someone who did not apply, and how the competing candidates were assessed. Fairness must be demonstrable to the people expected to accept the outcome.

The financial questions are legitimate. RTÉ director-general Kevin Bakhurst has indicated that Gilroy will feature among RTÉ’s 20 highest earners, yet the committee was not given his salary. Telling the public that remuneration reflects strategic importance and market considerations is an explanation so broad that it explains almost nothing.

What is the role worth? Who decided? Against what benchmark? What outcomes will establish whether the investment represents value? These are ordinary questions for an organisation sustained by compulsory licence fees and substantial public funding. Answering them should be routine.

There is an internal cost to opacity too. Employees being asked to accept organisational change, uncertainty, and a smaller workforce will examine how the rules operate for those recruited into prominent positions. Trust cannot flourish where management asks staff to take fairness on faith.

None of this requires turning Gilroy into a scapegoat. He did not write RTÉ’s governance commitments. The responsibility for honouring them belongs to the executives who did.

Nor should legitimate criticism become an excuse to weaken public service broadcasting. Ireland needs an independent, adequately funded RTÉ; that need makes competent, transparent management more urgent. The broadcaster rightly demands answers from the institutions it scrutinises. It should recognise the same obligation when the questions concern its own decisions. Reform cannot be measured solely in policies published, committees established, or assurances repeated. Its test is whether the next difficult question receives a straightforward answer.

From Gaza to Congress

America’s elections arrive wrapped in proclamations of renewal. Every victory promises a turning point; every winning speech announces a new beginning. Sometimes, the better reason for hope is a quieter story within the spectacle.

Adam Hamawy, an Egyptian-American surgeon who volunteered in Gaza, has won election to the House of Representatives from New Jersey. He will become the state’s first Muslim member of Congress. During his humanitarian work in Gaza, he performed more than 100 operations. Here was public service before there was a campaign, a doctor using his skills where they were desperately needed, among people whose suffering Washington had helped enable.

A former US army combat surgeon, Hamawy also helped save the life of Tammy Duckworth, now a senator, after her helicopter was shot down in Iraq. His record gives substance to a word American politics has too often reduced to a lapel badge: Service.

There is something hopeful in voters choosing such a man at a time when Muslims and immigrants are so routinely presented as threats. His election offers a practical answer to those who profit from suspicion: A community can entrust its future to someone the politics of hatred would have it fear.

That does not make one congressional victory a cure for America’s divisions. Nor should Hamawy’s faith place upon him any greater obligation to prove his belonging than applies to his colleagues. His constituents will rightly judge his work, but his election deserves attention beyond the arithmetic of congressional control. Compassion can command support. Witnessing Palestinian suffering need not disqualify someone from American public life. An immigrant’s story can still become part of the country’s democratic future.

The promises will be plentiful this week. Hamawy brings something more tangible: A record of answering other people’s need. That is a sound place to begin.

Mischief maker

Ireland has never been slow to claim a successful emigrant’s child. In Martin McDonagh’s case, we can surely dispense with the eligibility committee.

Born in London to Irish parents, he has earned his place among our national treasures, although he would probably find something objectionable about the ceremony.

His latest film, Wild Horse Nine, arrives in cinemas with John Malkovich, Sam Rockwell, and Steve Buscemi aboard a dark comedy involving CIA agents and Easter Island.

The geography has changed, but the appetite for mischief remains intact. From In Bruges to The Banshees of Inisherin, McDonagh trusts audiences to embrace cruelty, tenderness, and laughter.

His characters rarely deserve our affection, yet somehow earn it. In a culture eager to explain every joke and advertise every virtue, their irreverence is refreshing.

Originality, black humour, and a healthy suspicion of those who take themselves too seriously: What could be more Irish?

More in this section

Revoiced

Newsletter

Had a busy week? Sign up for some of the best reads from the week gone by. Selected just for you.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited