One-sided discussion on Irish neutrality does not serve democracy

The political and media focus on mainstream voices around the triple lock and militarism do not represent the views of an overwhelmingly pro-neutrality public
A panel on cybersecurity during the first day of the Consultative Forum on International Security Policy at UCC in June 2023. The authors write that, of the 80-plus speakers at that forum, only one publicly advocates maintaining neutrality. Picture: Larry Cummins

A panel on cybersecurity during the first day of the Consultative Forum on International Security Policy at UCC in June 2023. The authors write that, of the 80-plus speakers at that forum, only one publicly advocates maintaining neutrality. Picture: Larry Cummins

On a recent RTÉ radio show, presidential candidate Catherine Connolly was subjected to what can only be described as an interrogation. Over the course of 20 minutes, the interviewer did not ask her a single question about why she is standing, about her values and vision, or about the grassroots campaign building around her. Instead, Connolly was repeatedly asked to justify herself in light of points of criticism quoted from The Irish Times and Tipp FM.

This interview was just one example of numerous negative articles and discussions about Connolly in major media outlets in recent weeks. Whilst much of this negative coverage has focused on Connolly’s past association with figures deemed beyond the pale, the real motivation seems to lie with her positions on neutrality, militarisation, and foreign policy.

You have reached your article limit. Already a subscriber? Sign in

Unlimited access starts here.

Try from only €0.25 a day.

Cancel anytime

More in this section

Revoiced

Newsletter

Had a busy week? Sign up for some of the best reads from the week gone by. Selected just for you.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited