Article misleading about gender wage gap

Your article on the gender wage gap (Saturday, March 1) quotes unadjusted figures, without identifying them as such, which is misleading.

Article misleading about gender wage gap

The Eurostat website on which the article appears to be based uses the word ‘unadjusted’ 17 times to inform readers that the figures don’t tell the whole truth, but your article didn’t use the word once. When the figures are adjusted to include (for example) the fact that men work longer hours than women, a different picture emerges.

But the article is doubly misleading, because it does not consider the difference between the highest and lowest paid people of the same sex, nor make the charge of “slave labour” about, for example, lower paid women in relation to higher paid women.

You have reached your article limit. Already a subscriber? Sign in

Unlimited access starts here.

Try from only €0.25 a day.

Cancel anytime

More in this section

Revoiced

Newsletter

Had a busy week? Sign up for some of the best reads from the week gone by. Selected just for you.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited