Rethink on bail laws
The 16th amendment to the Constitution, passed in 1996, provided that a court could refuse bail where it feared that, while at liberty, a suspect would commit a serious criminal offence. Up to then, bail could only be refused if the accused was a flight risk or likely to interfere with witnesses.
Considering that this is the law of the land, it is extraordinary that a man could commit murder while on bail — twice — on charges concerning two separate violent offences.
While the presumption of innocence is an important civil liberty, it should never trump the over-riding consideration of protecting life — the greatest civil liberty of all.





