Are we calling time on the Seanad or giving Kenny a bloody nose?
Man 1: So I hear youâre going to be voting to save the Seanad?
Man 2: Absolutely. Iâm not having our democracy reduced. Iâm voting no and proud of it. This is not a dictatorship.
Man 1: Thatâs a big ironic, isnât it, your position on this?
Man 2: In what way?
Man 1: You went to University of Limerick, didnât you? That means you donât have a vote in Seanad elections. Youâre citing democracy to save an institution that doesnât allow you a vote because you went to the wrong university.
Man 2: Well, you have your vote donât you, as a UCC boy? So let me guess, judging by your tone you want the Seanad abolished. You have your vote and you probably donât even use it and then you give out and want the Seanad abolished when you donât even participate as you could.
Man 1: Participate? In what way? The whole thing is gerry-built. If you donât have a university degree, and from the right university, you donât get to vote. If thatâs not bad enough the place is a home for failed politicians on the way down, wannabe politicians on the way up, some teacherâs pets that the Taoiseach picks to give himself a majority to get every government measure through and a few bright sparks who get elected by the universities. Itâs not enough to justify spending âŹ20 million a year on is it? Thatâs what you call waste boy. Bunch of wasters.
Man 2: Now hang on. Thereâs no proof of that figure. Thatâs being spun just to create the impression that itâs all a waste of money, money weâll have once its shut, which I bet we wonât.
Man 1: Yes, there is.
Man 2: Well I want independent verification. And in any case itâs costing âŹ14 million that we donât have to hold this bloody referendum to abolish the thing in 2016. Thatâs a scandalous waste of money in any book. Iâm not voting to help Enda Kenny out with that.
Man 1: I thought you were an Enda supporter.
Man 2: Well, I was, but his failure to debate on television last Tuesday night didnât impress me one little bit. You tell me, why didnât Kenny go on the telly and explain his position? Itâs his big idea, supposedly his personal crusade, proof that he is bold and brave and imaginative too. Okay, why didnât he prove it to me? Whereâs the leadership?
Man 1: Kenny didnât need to engage in head-to-head television debates during the 2011 general election campaign to become Taoiseach and it didnât stop you voting for him.
Man 2: He took part. He was on the telly.
Man 1: He hid in the safety of large groups and wouldnât go near interviewers like Vincent Browne and that fellow Cooper on the radio.
Man 2: Well, I can sort of understand that. I mightnât like him on this one but they wouldnât exactly be fair to him would they? Why would he put himself through being grilled by them when he was going to win? Same with this referendum.
Man 1: So youâre conceding youâll lose.
Man 2: Maybe. Just ask yourself this though. What if this referendum was in doubt?
Man 1: What do you mean by that?
Man 2: OK I agree that it looks like itâs going to be passed but Iâm still hopeful that people will see sense and that the cynics and apathetic wonât be bothered to get up off their arses and go vote to abolish the thing and the good people will win. But I think it looks as if the Government is going to win so Kennyâs handlers have decided they donât need to expose him to a debate. But what if it was 50/50 in the polls? Would they send Kenny out to win it or would they be afraid heâd undermine the effort? I think I know the answer.
Man 1: I think we both do. But Iâll still be voting to abolish because this vote isnât about Kenny, itâs about how useless and costly and unnecessary the Seanad is.
Man 2: Donât be so damn populist. Your voting yes is just playing to this âa plague on all their housesâ attitude towards politicians. You should have more respect for our politicians. You can give out about democracy but is there anything else youâd try?
Man 1: Do you think the voting system for the Seanad is right? That you canât vote, just like 97% of the people in the pub? That nearly every person in this pub tonight canât vote, other than Mickey the gombeen councillor over in the corner there?
Man 2: Heâs a good man, gets things done. Heâs properly elected.
Man 1: Aha, he is and our senators arenât.
Man 2: Yes they are, according to the law as it stands. Iâd change that law, allow everyone to vote, reform the Seanad but thatâs not the issue weâre being asked to vote on. All weâre been asked to do is end it instead of changing it.
Man 1: Allow everyone to vote! Democratic yes, but to give us what? Two houses full of gobshites who pander to every local demand? One is bad enough without giving us two.
Man 2: Now youâre making my argument for me to save the Seanad, because itâs full of better intellects, people who arenât beholden to being re-elected and who do the populist thing.
Man 1: Are you serious? Do you follow Seanad debates? Do you think theyâre all as smart as people like Professor John Crown or Dr Sean Barrett? Those are the bloody exceptions. Where are the Mary Robinsonâs and WB Yeats of the present generation? Did you listen to them this year during the Protection of Life during Pregnancy debates? Ronan Mullen? Fidelma Healy Eames? Jimmy Walsh?
Man 2: All entitled to their views.
Man 1: Not according to Enda Kenny if they didnât vote the way he wanted if they were members of Fine Gael.
Man 2: Thatâs a different issue. I want to save it to reform it, to allow for more of the right type of people.
Man 1: Who are the right type of people? Elected by who? And this idea of reform! In this country! Reform? Fat chance! There have been 14 reports published about reform since 1938. Thatâs right, fourteen. Little or nothing has happened. Little or nothing will.
Man 2: I think you might get a surprise, that people will decide to save the Seanad because beneath of all their cynicism they like the checks and balances it provides to the overwhelming power of the DĂĄil. They appreciate the wit and wisdom of better debates than you hear in the DĂĄil, the presence of part-time people who have succeeded in other walks of life and who canât give all of their time to politics as would be needed in the DĂĄil.
Man 1: I love your idealism.
Man 2: I hate your cynicism. I hate the cynicism of holding a referendum in October, dominating the national airwaves, newspapers and social media in the run-up to the next austerity budget. As much as anything I want to vote no to punish Kenny for that.
Man 1: So thatâs it. Itâs not to save the Seanad at all. Youâve fallen out of love with Kenny and you want to give him a bloody nose. Thatâs a rubbish reason.
Youâre going to the wrong thing out of spite.
Man 2: Iâll give you the bloody nose if youâre not careful.
Barman: Gentlemen, time please, have you no homes to go to?
Both men: Just the one.
*




