Defence admits actions of one man 'suspicious' but don't lead to inevitable conclusion he tortured Kevin Lunney 

Closing speeches on behalf of three of the accused were delivered on Wednesday
Defence admits actions of one man 'suspicious' but don't lead to inevitable conclusion he tortured Kevin Lunney 

Kevin Lunney. File picture

The actions of one of the men accused of abducting and torturing Kevin Lunney are "very suspicious" but do not lead to the inevitable conclusion he was one of the men who bundled the businessman into the back of an Audi, beat him at a yard and dumped him on the side of a road, a defence barrister has told the Special Criminal Court.

Michael O'Higgins SC addressed the three-judge, non-jury court on Wednesday on behalf of the accused known as YZ, who can't be named for legal reasons. Mr O'Higgins warned the court to avoid coming to a conclusion that might appear logical based on suspicion but that falls short of the required level of proof.

Already a subscriber? Sign in

You have reached your article limit.

Unlimited access. Half the price.

Annual €130 €65

Best value

Monthly €12€6 / month

More in this section

Lunchtime News

Newsletter

Keep up with stories of the day with our lunchtime news wrap and important breaking news alerts.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited