Mother and baby home survivors on redress delay: 'They are playing a game of wait and die'
Peter Mulryan, 79, spent four years in the Tuam Mother and Baby Hhome, before he was boarded out to a family who abused him, and has not received any money from the State. Picture: Ray Ryan
A three-year delay in making redress payments to the country's aging survivors of mother and baby homes is "simply not fair on people who have been through so much", an expert in the area has said.
UCC law professor Conor OâMahony made the comments as the compensation package â worth about âŹ800m and due to be rolled out before the end of last year â continues to be delayed.
The Department of Children told the that âopening the scheme as soon as possible is an absolute priority and the scheme is set to open in Q1â, but survivors have yet to be given the green light to apply.
The Government has appointed a financial assessor to negotiate with the seven religious orders who ran the institutions about financial contributions â but there is no legal framework that can compel them to do so.
Professor OâMahony said the scheme could still open while negotiations take place. âThereâs no need to wait until any contributions are handed over, just open the scheme and have it up and runningâ he said.Â
âThis recommendation to compensate survivors was made three years ago by the Commission of Inquiry into Mother and Baby Homes when they produced their final report."
The redress scheme was recommended because of the appalling case of abuses that took place in the homes, by the religious orders.
Following a five-year inquiry spearheaded by former judge Yvonne Murphy, the State apologised to survivors for its failures.
Up to 34,000 people are believed to be eligible for a payment, however, there was widespread criticism following the exclusion of several categories of survivors, including babies who spent under six months in the homes and those who were "boarded outâ or fostered.
Professor OâMahony continued: "From a political point of view, the Government wants to be seen to lay some responsibility on the religious orders, who were deeply involved in the operation of the mother and baby homes.They also want to maintain the public financesâ.
Children's Minister Roderic OâGorman has sought financial contributions from seven Catholic bodies that ran homes or were linked to them: the Bon Secours sisters; the Daughters of Charity of St Vincent de Paul; Sisters of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and Mary; Our Lady of Charity of the Good Shepherd; the Sisters of Mercy; the Sisters of St John of God; and the Legion of Mary, a lay organisation.
Only one order, the Bon Secours nuns, who ran the Tuam Mother and Baby Home from 1925 to 1961 have agreed to contribute to the scheme â but as of yet, there is no confirmation of any secured deal.
Peter Mulryan, 79, spent four years in the Tuam Mother and Baby Hhome, before he was boarded out to a family who abused him.
Mr Mulryan, who lives in Ballinasloe, Co Galway, said: âThe whole thing is a disgrace. I have never, ever received a penny from the State for the abuses and neglect I suffered.
âThere isnât a sign of anything. I am disgusted with it to be honest, what they are doing to us, they are playing a game of wait and die so they have less to give a few euros to.
âThey promised us the sun moon and stars â first they promised a wellbeing payment, but I am a cancer survivor, and they didnât renew my medical card. Instead, Iâm on a GP card and Iâm nearly 80.
âThey say they are giving us redress this year, I take that with a pinch of salt, how many times did they promise this that and the other, it never came they didnât treat me well.
âThey never even took my DNA either â itâs like everything else they are using delay tacticsâ.
Mr Mulryan was recently appointed to the advisory board for the forthcoming exhumation of the Tuam babies. The first meeting takes place on January 23 in Dublin and he will be working with the director Daniel McSweeney.
He continued: âI will voice my opinion at that, but we are nearly a year into it and the director of the exhumation only has a two-and-a-half-year contract. I donât hold out much hopeâ.
Colleen Anderson was born in Sean Ross Abbey in 1965 and adopted to the US to a niece of the head nun, Sr Hildegarde, who ran the Roscrea home.
She was subjected to beatings and physical punishments until she ran away as a teenager and never went back home.
âMy adoptive mother was very violent. She suffered with schizophrenia and while that doesnât make you violent, I donât think that adoption would go through today if that was the case. Either way, she beat me regularly and I ended up on the streetsâ.
Ms Anderson, who is now living in Ireland, which she calls âhomeâ, says she has little faith in the redress scheme.
âI am part of the scheme Iâm assuming since I was at Sean Ross Abbey for a bit over two years. I feel, sad, hurt and a bit angry on what I think is discrimination on anyone, mother, or child at any of those institutions that were there less than six months, or boarded out.
âIn my opinion every child, mother and family at some point were affected mentally and possibly physically, so as the saying goes, 'one for all and all for one'. I sincerely hope they get some sort of payment for even walking through the door, not by choice.â

A UCC professor says it is âbitter-sweetâ that his mother, who was in the Tuam home for more than three years, will never know about the redress scheme because she has dementia.
Margaret Garavan, nee Daly, who recently marked her 91st birthday, was admitted to a nursing home in recent years when she began to show signs of losing her memory.
The mother of six from Castlebar, Co Mayo, was one of seven children who was incarcerated in the Tuam Mother and Baby Home, before she was boarded out.
In the past decade, Mrs Garavan with the help of her son, Thomas, a lecturer in UCC has traced her six siblings, and was looking forward to receiving a redress payment before she died.
However, she will now never get to enjoy her redress.
Speaking to the , Mr Garavan said: âThe Government should hang their head in shame.
âIt is so bitter sweet the whole thingâ he said. âThe Government knew about the scheme in 2021, but it only came into law last year. But by then it was just too late for my poor mother.
âShe will never know about her compensation, she will never enjoy it, and neither will her sister, who also has dementia.
In a statement, the Department of Children said: The Mother and Baby Institutions Payment Scheme will be the largest scheme of its type in the history of the State, with an anticipated 34,000 people eligible under its terms. Given its scale and significance, the scheme has been placed on a statutory footing as enabling legislation was signed into law in July this year.
âThe Mother and Baby Institutions Payment Scheme is one element of a comprehensive package of support measures agreed by the Government as part of the Action Plan for Survivors and Former Residents of Mother and Baby and County Home Institutions.Â




