Ruling later in Quinn action
The Quinns claim Mr Wallace made serious and prejudicial comments in an affidavit, based on claims from unidentified informants, presented in a “peculiar and improper manner” before the Commercial Court last May. The bank had gone on a “wild goose chase”, they contend.
IBRC opposed their application to cross-examine Mr Wallace as “unreal” in a context where, the bank argued, there was evidence of a scheme to strip substantial assets from the family’s international property group.
Lunchtime News
Newsletter
Keep up with stories of the day with our lunchtime news wrap and important breaking news alerts.



