IMO: HSE could easily restore lost medical cards
Dr Ray Walley contradicted suggestions by the HSE that it would not be logistically possible to immediately restore thousands of discretionary cards which were taken away from children with Down Syndrome and people with serious illnesses or disabilities through a review process that has been taking place over the past two years.
He said family doctors, through a computer system, could reinstate eligibility on an emergency basis in what would be a âvery quickâ process and policy makers could then sit down to figure out who should get cards based on their medical conditions.
âCare needs to be provided on the basis of medical needs,â he said. âThere is no evidence-based medicine out there that indicates that 240,00 under sixes are being disenfranchised.â
He said the âŹ37 million being collected through a tax levy on prescriptions should be used to provide the cover for discretionary cards.
Communications Minister Pat Rabbitte said the latest medical card probity exercise was a âGovernment decisionâ at the time of the last budget âin order to protect education and in particular social welfareâ.
Defending the role of the Junior Minister with responsibility for the system, Alex White, who is also contesting the Labour Party leadership, Mr Rabbitte said: âIt was a Government decision, âŹ113m was finally agreed in the negotiations, through probity measures. Nobody was very clear at the time what exactly they were. âTo say that the Junior Minister in the Department is responsible; heâs responsible for doing what heâs told by the Government. It was a cabinet decision.â
He also said there was âquite a lot of people who didnât bother engaging to replyâ with the review process â based on figures showing around 10,000 people lost their cards last years as a result of not producing the correct documentation or not producing any at all when asked to by the HSE.
âIt is very fair to criticise the Government for taking so long to respond to a number of cases in which nobody could defend the card being taken away, and the manor and tenor of the correspondence that they got,â he said.
âBut is it unreasonable â given the straits that we are in â that the situation ought to be examined,â he asked. âThe manner of its doing is another issue, but is it not reasonable when there was quite a lot of people who didnât even bother engaging to reply.â
When it was put to him that many did not provide the necessary material because they were incapable due to ill health, learning disabilities or dementia, he said: âThat may be so, but you canât say either that a lot of them who didnât reply were not entitled to have a card.â




