Flawed privacy bill offers us no protection

The 2006 bill goes too far in dealing with press invasions and fails to deal with other important aspects, writes Eoin O’Dell

Flawed privacy bill offers us no protection

LAST Friday, the French magazine Closer published topless photographs of the duchess of Cambridge. The following day, the Irish Daily Star also published some of those photographs.

Yesterday, a French court held that this constituted an invasion of the duchess’s privacy, and blocked any further publication of the intimate shots. If she were now to sue the Star in an Irish court, the result would be the same.

You have reached your article limit. Already a subscriber? Sign in

Unlimited access starts here.

Try from only €0.25 a day.

Cancel anytime

More in this section

Lunchtime News

Newsletter

Get a lunch briefing straight to your inbox at noon daily. Also be the first to know with our occasional Breaking News emails.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited