14 allegations of domestic violence The Sun relied on in Johnny Depp libel case
The High Court ruling on Johnny Deppâs libel claim has found that the actor assaulted his ex-wife Amber Heard on a dozen occasions.
News Group Newspapers (NGN) originally relied on two alleged incidents of domestic violence during the marriage, on April 21 and May 21 2016, but eventually added other allegations to their pleaded defence.
In Mondayâs ruling, Mr Justice Nicol concluded that âthe great majority of alleged assaults of Ms Heard by Mr Depp have been proved to the civil standardâ.
But he said he was ânot persuadedâ that an alleged âincident of violenceâ in Los Angeles in December 2014 âconstituted a physical assault of Ms Heard by Mr Deppâ, and that he could not rule an alleged incident in LA in November 2015 had been proven because it was not put to Mr Depp in cross-examination.
Here are the details of the 14 allegations relied on by NGN, and the judgeâs findings in each.
â 1. Early 2013
Ms Heard says Mr Depp was completely sober until early 2013, and around that time he allegedly hit her for the first time when they were in Los Angeles.
The court hears that this allegedly happened after Ms Heard joked about a tattoo Mr Depp had done on his arm during his relationship with actress Winona Ryder, which originally read âWinona Foreverâ, but was altered to âWino Foreverâ after they split.
She claims Mr Depp later cried and apologised, telling her that he sometimes turns into âthe monsterâ when he snaps.
Mr Depp has âexpressly deniedâ hitting Ms Heard and said that, around early 2013, he had âconfined himself to drinking wine and using marijuana, having been sober from around December 2011 to August 2012â.
In his ruling, Mr Justice Nicol says he accepts Ms Heardâs evidence that Mr Depp used the term âthe monsterâ to ârefer to that part of his personality when, affected by drink and/or drugs he would do things which he would not otherwise do and of which he might have no recollection afterâ.
The judge concludes that this incident did occur.
â 2. March 2013
Ms Heard claims Mr Depp was angry she had hung up a painting by her ex-partner Tasya Van Ree by her bed in her LA home, then tried to set the painting on fire and hit her âso hard that blood from her lip ended up on the wallâ.
Mr Depp, however, says he simply asked Ms Heard to move the painting from the bedroom âas a courtesyâ and that she had an âextreme reactionâ. He says he did not hit her at all.
He also says a text he later sent describing the evening as a âdisco bloodbathâ was to âplacate Ms Heardâ and not an apology for alleged violence.
Mr Justice Nicol concluded that Mr Depp âdid assaultâ Ms Heard as she and NGN alleged in this incident.
â 3. June 2013
Ms Heard and Mr Depp were in Hicksville, US, with a group of people including Ms Heardâs sister Whitney and Mr Deppâs assistant Nathan Holmes.
Ms Heard says Mr Depp, who was âtaking drugsâ, became âenragedâ and âjealousâ when one of her friends touched her, and he then threw glasses at her, ripped her dress and damaged the cabin they were staying in.
Mr Depp says he drank and took magic mushrooms, as did Ms Heard and her friends who also took MDMA.
He claims Ms Heardâs friend touched Ms Heard in an âextremely sexual mannerâ and he spoke to her to ask her to stop, but denies throwing or smashing glasses, or ripping Ms Heardâs dress.
Mr Justice Nicol concludes that in the course of Mr Depp and Ms Heardâs argument, the actor âcaused significant damage to the trailerâ.
He says âthe argument and damage to property are symptomatic of Mr Deppâs manner when âthe monsterâ side of his personality was dominantâ.
The judge notes that he addresses another aspect of this incident in a confidential annex to his ruling in which he âdoes not accept the further allegations made by Ms Heard in relation to this incidentâ.
â 4. May 24 2014
The pair took a private plane from Boston to LA: Ms Heard says that during the flight, Mr Depp, who had been drinking heavily, threw objects at her, pushed a chair at her, slapped her and kicked her in the back before passing out in the toilet.
Mr Depp says Ms Heard âbegan to harangue himâ as he was sketching in a notebook, he then tried to âplayfully tap her on the bottom with his footâ, at which Ms Heard took âgreat offenceâ and âcontinued to verbally berateâ him.
In his ruling, Mr Justice Nicol finds that in the course of the flight, Mr Depp âmanaged to kick Ms Heard on her back or bottomâ, adding âthis was more than a âplayful tapââ and contrary to what Mr Depp and his former personal assistant Stephen Deuters had said in evidence.
The judge also said he âdid not acceptâ Mr Deppâs claim that he âsimply chose to sleep in the toilet to get away from Ms Heardâ, saying he passed out âat some stageâ due to âalcohol and drug consumptionâ.
â 5. August 2014
The couple went to the Bahamas, Mr Depp says to âcure his dependence on painkillersâ, although Ms Heard claims he was trying to give up other drugs too.
Ms Heard says Mr Depp had âseveral manic episodesâ and his private doctor had to be flown over to help.
She alleges that he slapped, kicked and grabbed her by the hair during an attack.
Mr Depp alleges Ms Heard stopped a nurse from giving him treatment while he was going through withdrawal.
Mr Justice Nicol concludes that Mr Deppâs feelings towards Ms Heard âvacillated wildlyâ during the trip, and at times he was âextremely fond of her and grateful to herâ while at other times âhe imagined that she was the cause of his pain and that her actions increased his tormentâ.
The judge finds that it is âmore likely than not that Mr Depp did push Ms Heard on at least one occasionâ, but adds âI am not able to conclude whether there was more than this one assaultâ.
â 6. December 17 2014
Ms Heard says Mr Depp was âviolent towardsâ her in LA, and later texted calling himself a âf****** savageâ and a âlunaticâ.
Mr Depp denies any allegation of violence and says NGN has âfailed to provide any particulars of the alleged violenceâ.
The judge concludes that he is ânot persuadedâ that this alleged incident âconstituted a physical assault of Ms Heard by Mr Deppâ.
â 7. January 25 2015
While the couple were in Tokyo, Japan, Ms Heard claims Mr Depp shoved and slapped her and grabbed her by the hair, before standing over her and shouting while she was on the floor â which Mr Depp denies.
Mr Justice Nicol concludes that Mr Depp âdid assault Ms Heard as she and the defendants have allegedâ in this incident.
â 8. March 2015
Mr Depp is said to have repeatedly assaulted Ms Heard after an argument over his alleged use of MDMA during a three-day trip to Australia. She says he stayed up all night, taking pills and drinking, and then attacked her again the next morning.
Ms Heard says that the following night, Mr Depp pushed her into a table tennis table, tore off her nightgown and attacked her, before smashing a telephone into a wall and severing the top of his middle finger.
She also claims he had written messages to her around the house in a mixture of paint and blood from his finger, which Mr Depp admits doing while âin shockâ, as well as having âurinated all over the house in an attempt to write messagesâ, which he denies.
Mr Depp says Ms Heard was in âa prolonged and extreme rageâ following an argument over a post-nuptial agreement. He says he broke his sobriety, after not having had a drink in more than a year, with several glasses of vodka.
He claims Ms Heard threw a bottle at him, severing the top of his finger, and stubbed a cigarette out on his cheek. He denies being violent towards her.
Mr Justice Nicol says in his ruling that âa very considerable amount of damageâ was done to the house in Queensland, Australia, and says he âdoes not acceptâ Mr Deppâs evidence that it was Ms Heard who caused the damage, or the majority of it.
He also says he does not accept that Ms Heard was responsible for the injury to Mr Deppâs finger, adding âwhat exactly caused the injury is uncertainâ and it âmay well be that Mr Depp accidentally cut his finger on a piece of broken glassâ.
The judge finds: âMs Heardâs description of the days in Australia as akin to a hostage situation was something of a hyperbole.
âShe was not being kept in the house against her will. The house was set back on a long drive, but there were people around. Ms Heard had a mobile phone. She agreed in cross-examination that she could have contacted anyone. In the accidentally recorded conversation she spoke of phoning her sister. Ms Heard could have left the house.â
But Mr Justice Nicol adds: âYet taking all the evidence together, I accept that she was the victim of sustained and multiple assaults by Mr Depp in Australia.
âIt is a sign of the depth of his rage that he admitted scrawling graffiti in blood from his injured finger and then, when that was insufficient, dipping his badly injured finger in paint and continuing to write messages and other things.
âI accept her evidence of the nature of the assaults he committed against her. They must have been terrifying. I accept that Mr Depp put her in fear of her life.â
The judge also said he accepted the further allegation set out in the confidential annex.
â 9. March 2015
Ms Heard says Mr Depp became âenragedâ when they were in LA with her sister and began destroying things in the house before hitting her âhard and repeatedlyâ. She also claims he tried to push her sister down the stairs before hitting Ms Heard again.
Mr Depp, however, says Ms Heard was âberating him in a rageâ as he tried to leave, threw a can of Red Bull at him and punched him in the face before he finally left.
The ruling says that Ms Heard alleged this argument started because she âdiscovered text messages which she said showed he (Mr Depp) had been cheating on herâ and she confronted him.
Mr Justice Nicol says âit is no part of my function to decide whether Mr Depp was having an affairâ any more than it is his job to decide if Ms Heard had been having affairs â which was alleged during the trial and she denied.
He concludes that in this case, Mr Depp âdid assault Ms Heardâ as she and NGN alleged.
â 10. August 2015
While they were on the Eastern and Oriental Express in South East Asia, Ms Heard alleges Mr Depp âpicked a fightâ with her, hit her and pushed her against a wall by the throat, âcausing her to fear for her lifeâ â which is denied by Mr Depp.
The judge says he âaccepts that Ms Heard was assaulted by Mr Depp as she and the defendants have allegedâ.
â 11. November 26 2015
In LA, Mr Depp is alleged to have ripped Ms Heardâs shirt and âthrew her around the roomâ, also throwing a wine glass and a âheavy glass decanterâ at her, as well as pushing her over a chair which caused her to bang her head against a wall.
Mr Depp says they were in LA for Thanksgiving, but denies any allegation of abuse.
Mr Justice Nicol says he does not accept that this incident is proven as it had not been put to Mr Depp in cross-examination.
â 12. December 15 2015
Ms Heard claims Mr Depp threw a decanter at her in their penthouse in LA, then slapped her and dragged her through the apartment by her hair, allegedly pulling âlarge chunks of hairâ from Ms Heardâs scalp.
She says he then followed her upstairs and pushed her to the floor while shouting âyou think youâre a f****** tough guyâ before headbutting her.
Ms Heard says that when she told Mr Depp she wanted to leave him, he grabbed her and screamed: âI f****** will kill you â Iâll f****** kill you, you hear me?â
It is alleged that during this incident, Mr Depp wrote a message on the kitchen countertop in gold pen saying: âWhy be a fraud? All is such bullshit.â
Mr Depp, though, denies the allegations, saying âMs Heard fabricated the alleged violenceâ, falsely claiming that âblonde hair on the floor was her hairâ.
He also claims that âthe only violence committed on that date was by Ms Heardâ, who allegedly âviolently attackedâ him.
Mr Justice Nicol concludes that the couple had an argument on December 15, and that âit is more probable than not that on this occasion, as on others, Mr Depp was under the influence of alcohol and/or controlled drugsâ.
The argument was ânot just verbal; it became physicalâ, the judgeâs ruling says, finding that âMr Depp assaulted Ms Heardâ.
â 13. April 21 2016
Ms Heard says Mr Depp arrived at her birthday party at their LA home late, âdrunk and high on drugsâ, and they had an argument after the guests had left.
She claims he threw a bottle of champagne at her, which hit a wall, and threw a glass of wine over her.
The actress claims Mr Depp then grabbed her by the shoulders, pushed her on to a bed and blocked the door when she tried to leave. She alleges he grabbed her by the hair and shoved her to the floor, screaming and threatening her.
She alleges that after being violent towards her, he âstormed out of the apartmentâ, leaving a note reading: âHappy F****** Birthday.â
Mr Depp says he arrived at the party around two hours late following a meeting with his new business manager and accountants, and that he was not on drugs but âshocked from what he had learnt at the meeting about his business affairsâ.
He claims Ms Heard had been âdrinking heavilyâ and attacked him while he was reading in bed, punching him in the face four times before he grabbed her arms to stop her.
Mr Depp says the next day, Ms Heard or one of her friends âdefecated in Mr Deppâs and Ms Heardâs bedâ, and claimed Ms Heard later told the building manager Kevin Murphy that it was âjust a harmless prankâ â at which point he âthen resolved to divorce Ms Heardâ.
Mr Justice Nicol says in his ruling that Mr Depp had a business meeting that evening during which he was given âvery grim news about his financial situationâ.
He says Mr Depp admitted taking marijuana, adding he finds it âmore likely than notâ that Mr Depp âalso drank alcohol and took cocaineâ.
The judge concludes Mr Depp âassaulted Ms Heard as he had done on previous occasions when he was stressedâ.
On the so-called âdefecation incidentâ, the judge says that Mr Deppâs belief that Ms Heard or one of her friends was responsible was relevant because it led him to conclude the marriage could not continue, and it was the case of part of an argument that took place the following month.
But he added that whether Ms Heard or her friends were responsible is ânot importantâ, saying âit is remote from the central issue, namely whether Mr Depp assaulted Ms Heardâ.
â 14. May 21 2016
Mr Depp arrived at their LA apartment, allegedly âdrunk and highâ while Ms Heard was there with friends. Ms Heard said Mr Depp became âvery angryâ, throwing her phone at her and hitting her in the eye before smashing âeverything he couldâ with a magnum of champagne.
He says he went to the apartment with two security guards to collect his belongings after Ms Heard and her sister ârepeatedlyâ tried to contact him.
Mr Depp denies being violent, and claims his two security guards entered the room when they heard Ms Heard shouting, and saw her ârepeatedly screaming, âstop hitting me, Johnnyââ while he was 20ft away in the kitchen.
He also says that two police officers who attended the apartment after the incident âsaw no injuries or bruising or swellingâ.
Mr Justice Nicol says the âconflict in evidenceâ in relation to this evidence is âparticularly sharpâ, with some witnesses who saw Ms Heard in the days after saying her face showed no sign of injury, and other evidence of her with injuries to her face.
He says: âThere is evidence which I find compelling of witnesses who saw Ms Heard with injuries to her face and who took photographs of these.â
The judge says he reaches the view âthat Mr Depp did assault Ms Heard as she alleges in Incident 14â.
