Since April 2015, EU countries can ban GMO cultivation on their territory, but should they have the same power regarding their commercialisation?
The European Parliament’s environment committee has rejected plans for this, fearing it could lead to problems.
EU farmers and their co-ops, represented by Copa-Cogeca, welcomed the Parliament Committee’s thumbs down to allowing member states decide whether or not to authorise use of genetically modified food or feed in their countries.
Copa-Cogeca secretary-general Pekka Pesonen said if the Commission’s proposal went through, competition would have been distorted in the EU, and the livelihoods of livestock farmers who rely on imports of feed would be threatened.
The European Parliament has issued the following guide to GMOs.
GMO stands for genetically modified organisms. They are organisms whose genetic material has been artificially modified in order to give it a new property. For example, this could be to make it easier for a plant to resist a disease, insects or drought, or to increase crop productivity.
Maize, cotton, soybean, oilseed rape, sugar beet.
GMOs can only be cultivated or sold for consumption in the EU after they have been authorised at the EU level. This process includes a scientific risk assessment.
Only one GMO has been approved for cultivation in the EU so far. Maize MON 810 was authorised for cultivation in 1998, but this authorisation has now expired, and is waiting for renewal. In 2013, it was mostly cultivated in Spain, and on a small scale in Portugal, the Czech Republic, Romania and Slovakia.
There are eight applications for approval pending, including the renewal of maize MON 810. So far, 58 GMOs have been authorised for consumption in food and feed in the EU.
They include maize, cotton, soybean, oilseed rape and sugar beet, and another 58 are waiting for approval.
Most of the GMOs authorised in the EU are used to feed farm animals, but some imported food might also contain them. The EU food labelling system obliges companies to indicate if the food or feed they produce contains GMOs.
This applies when GMOs account for at least 0.9% of the food or the feed. Companies also have the option to indicate on a label that their product does not contain GMOs.
It depends if we are talking about cultivating GMOs or about including them in food products.
When it comes to cultivation, the authorisation is given at EU level, but member states have the last word. Since April 2015, countries can decide to ban the cultivation on their territory at any time during the authorisation procedure or even after authorisation has been granted. Countries can justify the ban for a variety of reasons and not, as was the case before, exclusively on the grounds of health or environment risks.
However, for commercialisation, EU countries still have to abide by the decision at EU level.
The European Commission is proposing to give member states the power to ban the commercialisation of GMOs on their territory, even if they have already been approved at EU level. However, Parliament’s environment and food safety committee voted against it October 13.
Parliament’s environment and food safety committee rejected the proposal on October 13, because they fear it could prove unworkable and lead to border controls between countries that disagree on GMOs, which would affect the internal market.
All MEPs will now vote on the proposal during the plenary session in Strasbourg later this month.
If they also reject the proposal, then the current rules remain in effect, and a majority of member states can vote to approve or ban the commercialisation across the EU.
If there is no majority for either option, then the decision has to be taken by the Commission.