Funding must be secured to open GLAS scheme

IFA has asked Agriculture Minister Simon Coveney to organise meetings around the country to outline his plans for commonages.
Funding must be secured to open GLAS scheme

The call comes from IFA Hill Committee Chairman Pat Dunne, as the Department of Agriculture prepares to set minimum and maximum stocking densities for commonages, and proposes the €120 per hectare GLAS agri-environment scheme, which will be open to commonage farmers only if 50% of active participants comply with the scheme, or those farming 50% of the commonage area.

What are the main questions commonage farmers want answered by the Agriculture Minister?

Pillar II Rural Development measures are critically important to hill farmers. Securing €580m per annum was the result of a major IFA campaign over the last four years.

October’s Budget is critical, as funding has to be secured for the opening of the GLAS scheme in 2015. IFA has challenged the minister to open the scheme in the autumn of this year, with contracts beginning in early 2015 and significant payments at the end of next year. Farmers in hill areas must secure GLAS payments, as the restrictions that apply to them have a severe impact on their income.

The priority for the minister has to be allowing 30,000 farmers into GLAS in 2015, with a high proportion of entrants from commonage and hill areas. With new rules being introduced on stocking levels, commonage farmers must be in a position to maximise their GLAS payments. In addition, the Areas of Natural Constraints scheme (formerly Disadvantaged Areas) complements the basic payment system, greening and GLAS.

Could the ‘50% rule’ prevent some active farmers from taking part in GLAS?

In relation to the 50% management agreement (in order to gain access to GLAS), this will apply only to the active farmers. If more than 50% of the land comes in, they will also qualify as, in some instances, some farmers may own more than one share. Importantly, where this 50% is proving difficult to reach, IFA will hold Minister Simon Coveney to his commitment that active farmers cannot be excluded. Specifically, the new Implementation Committee has, as its terms of reference, to assist in these situations. In the Rural Development Programme, where the management agreement is secured, commonage farmers also have the option of qualifying for GLAS+, which will increase their payments by a further €2,000, to an overall maximum of €7,000. IFA pressed very hard to increase the commonage payment of €75 per hectare (under AEOS).

The payment has now been increased to €120. However, we are disappointed that the private Natura payment is set at only €79. This needs to increase in line with other designations, such as hen harrier, chough and corncrake.

Over 12,000 farmers receive a single farm payment in respect of commonages. There are fears some of them may lose the SFP from 2015, because of the requirement that the farmer must be ‘active’, with a yet-to-be defined ‘minimum activity’. Is this a big worry for farmers?

Farmers with commonage and marginal land have to have a minimum stocking rate to comply with EU rules. This is a concern, after major difficulties with the eligilible land issue. Minister Coveney must ensure farmers are given every opportunity to meet whatever minimum activity is required. The ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach is not acceptable, and the Implementation Committee, chaired by Joe Healy, must deal with this in a flexible manner.

The implementation committee will examine commonage-farmer single-payment problem cases, and their issues on priority entry into the GLAS agri-environment scheme. Does IFA anticipate this implementation committee will deal fairly with farmers’ issues?

This body is being set up. IFA will be holding detailed discussions with the committee to ensure that, as part of its objectives, it deals with all situations in hills and commonages.

IFA had pushed the minister to set up this committee some time ago. It is unfortunate that it has yet to start its work. We need to see it up and running, without delay.

Commonage farmers can submit assessments by professional planners, if they are unhappy with minimum and maximum, stocking densities set for them by the Department of Agriculture and its agencies. Is this satisfactory?

Minimum and maximum figures published in 2012 were considered by commonage farmers to be inaccurate, not reflecting the position on the ground.

It was a desktop exercise, and would be a totally unsatisfactory basis to establish sustainable stocking levels.

A commonage-by-commonage assessement would be a far better way to do this.

For disadvantaged area payments, farmers must have 0.15 livestock units per hectare. Will newly required stocking rates be set above that level?

Given the differences between commonages, and the fact that farmers will be meeting a minimum standard as part of the basis-payment scheme, the 0.15-livestock-unit-per-hectare qualification does not apply. Since the 0.15-lu-per-hectare seven-month rule came in two years ago, commonage farmers were deemed eligible, even if they were below that stocking level, as they were complying with the Commonage Framework Plan.

More in this section


Keep up-to-date with all the latest developments in Farming with our weekly newsletter

Sign up

Our Covid-free newsletter brings together some of the best bits from, as chosen by our editor, direct to your inbox every Monday.

Sign up