Ms Justice Deirdre Murphy, describing Mr Cunningham’s application as “entirely unmeritorious”, said no evidence had been provided to back up his claim that the receiver did not achieve the best possible price for numbers 17, 18, and 19 Moore Lane, which had been used as a car park.
They were sold for €550,000.
Mr Cunningham is director and holder of half the shares in Keelgrove Properties Ltd which went into receivership in December 2012.
The other half of Keelgrove was owned by Treasury Holdings whose principals, Johnny Ronan and Richard Barrett, Mr Cunningham says he has since fallen out with.
Treasury itself had gone into liquidation the previous October.
Mr Cunningham claimed that as a consequence of Treasury’s liquidation, he became entitled to their shares in Keelgrove by virtue of a provision in their shareholders’ agreement.
He brought proceedings seeking a number of directions including that there was no validity to a 1997 mortgage between Keelgrove and Bank of Scotland (BoS) which took the mortgage over from Equity Bank.
He also challenged the validity of the subsequent appointment by BoS of receiver Tom Kavanagh over the Moore Lane properties which was subject of the mortgage.
He claimed the sale of the property to Kendlebell Mid-West Ltd should have been notified to Keelgrove.
He sought directions from the court on whether the best price had been achieved for it, a declaration the receiver had no power to sell, and an order restoring possession to Keelgrove.
Ms Justice Murphy said the car park was taken over by Kendlebell in May 2014 after it bought the properties from the receiver.
Mr Cunningham said he used IR£164,000 of his own money to buy the Moore Lane properties, with the rest of the funding coming from Treasury and the mortgage.
Mr Cunningham and Treasury’s Mr Barrett executed the mortgage deed on behalf of Keelgrove, the judge said.
Mr Cunningham maintained that at the time he executed the mortgage on behalf of Keelgrove, he was not in fact a director of the company and therefore it was not a valid legal mortgage.
BoS said it was valid.
BoS later demanded repayment of €831,000.
Dismissing his claim, Ms Justice Murphy said a number of reliefs sought by Mr Cunningham relating to the validity of the receiver’s appointment were not appropriate for the relevant part of company law under which he brought the case.
Even if she was wrong in that view, she believed Mr Cunningham and Keelgrove were not entitled to succeed.
Keelgrove, as it is in receivership, had no standing to do so, and Mr Cunningham, who had standing, had not supported his application with evidence.
No evidence has been adduced to substantiate the claim the receiver did not achieve the best price possible for the sale of the properties at Moore Lane.