Crosbie ‘failed to disclose assets’

A letter sent by solicitors for Nama in August 2012 said full and complete disclosure was a requirement of Nama’s January 2012 memorandum of understanding with Mr Crosbie and his “lack of candour” in dealings with Nama was “simply not acceptable”, especially when Mr Crosbie and related companies collectively owed Nama more than €420m.
Nama was terminating the memorandum, reserving all its rights, and wanted Mr Crosbie to take various steps, including resigning directorships of companies and sell various properties, the letter said.