Commission to take finance ministers to court
It says the ministers, having agreed that France and Germany were about to run illegal budget deficits of more than 3% of GDP for the third row in a year, should have taken action as laid down in the rules.
Instead, they let the unionâs two largest economies off the hook and agreed they could implement their own prescriptions to bring their economies back into line with the Stability Pact rules designed to keep the eurozone stable.
The EC, announcing the decision in Strasbourg, said its appeal to the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg was purely on a procedural issue, but it is being interpreted as part of the continuing power play with the member States.
Ecofin Council president Charlie McCreevy simply noted the commissionâs decision and said the next meeting of the ministers, which he will chair, will process the pact updates in the usual way.
The commission will ask the court to fast-track the hearing, which could take between three and six months and could leave Mr McCreevy having to deal with the outcome during his six months in the chair.
The 20-member commission agreed to refer the ministersâ decision taken last November 25 to court after a long and heated discussion when the six commissioners from France, Germany and Britain argued against the action.
In the end, no vote was called and the decision was taken by consensus. It also agreed to examine how the eurozone economy is governed and consider how to reform the Stability and Growth Pact.
Commission spokesman Gerassimos Thomas said the difficulty was that the ministersâ approach could be repeated by other Councils of Ministers. âWe need clarification,â he said. Under the terms of the treaty, the EC gives its analysis and proposes measures for countries breaching Stability Pact rules.
If the ministers agree with the analysis, they are obliged to take the next proscribed step, which in the case of Germany and France, would bring them closer to being fined up to .5% of their GDP or a total of about âŹ19 billion.
European Parliament president and economist Pat Cox said that while rules needed to be applied, it also required common sense.
The real challenge was to revise the pactâs rules, but he warned the EC step was risky. âMy concern is that any legal wrangling does not drain vital political energy away from the reform process at a critical time,â he said.
The European Central Bank had cautioned against the commission taking the issue to court, but the response from the market and economic analysts last night was mixed.
Dresdner Kleinworth Wasserstein chief fixed income strategist Peter Fertig said: âThe market has already largely discounted that the pact in the form that it has been is not very effective.
"Thatâs not at the front of marketsâ minds. It is more developments in foreign exchange markets and expectations of monetary policy on both sides of the Atlantic.â






