Michael Clifford: Big three mad as hell trying to feel the anger

Politicians have been talking tough about crime. Some progressive measures have been promised but none that will win a great number of votes writes Michael Clifford

Michael Clifford: Big three mad as hell trying to feel the anger

For many political entities, there appears to be one overriding theme in relation to justice during election campaigns. Talk tough. Tough on crime, tougher on criminals.

Maybe here and there throw in something to show you’re tough on the causes of crime, but the main thing is to be so tough that you are reaching out to feel the voter’s anger.

In this election, the big three — formerly the big two until Sinn Féin’s ascent in opinion polls — are mad as hell in their attempts to feel the anger.

Fianna Fáil, for instance, wants you to know that they will change the law to allow in evidence the opinion of a chief superintendent as to the guilt of a suspect.

Fine Gael are sticking it to the criminals by increasing the number of prison places. And Sinn Féin is allocating money to the prison service specifically to tackle the problems of gangs in prisons.

The last proposal sums up a lot of the verbiage in this area at election time.

The Shinners’ manifesto pledges to “increase prison service annual funding by €19.5m to enable disruption of activities and recruitment by organised criminal gangs”.

Note the figure to be allocated. It’s next to impossible to discover where they came up with such a specific sum. Was it that in the overall spend plans a sum just short of €20m was sitting around and somebody thought it would send a good signal to use that against prison gangs?

Note also that it’s not a case of allocating the money to prison service management to determine how best it might be spent, but is instead for a specific electorally-friendly get-tough policy.

To be fair to the Shinners, they are also the only party to propose the establishment of a sentencing council. This would provide for input from civil society into sentencing guidelines, cutting down on controversial sentences that undermine confidence in the system.

Fianna Fáil’s most controversial proposal is the plan to introduce the evidence of a chief super in trials involving gangland crime.

This was first announced in the wake of the horrific murder of Keane Mulready Woods last month. A similar power was used under the Offences Against the State Act to identify members of paramilitary subversives.

Keane Mulready Woods
Keane Mulready Woods

The opinion of a superintendent that a defendant in court was a member of a terrorist organisation was repeatedly used during the Northern troubles.

Expanding the power in this manner could be tricky.

In the first instance, it would be open to constitutional challenge. There is also the problem that chief supers’ knowledge of individuals’ activity would come through to them second hand from a subordinate.

Guards in senior management are rarely in touch with what is happening on the ground simply because they have enough to be getting on with in their management roles. So a court would effectively bereceiving an opinion second hand.

Both Micheál Martin and party justice spokesperson Jim O’Callaghan have said that if there is a constitutional problem they would put the matter to a referendum.

This is highly unlikely.

Chalk this measure down as one that will disappear into a black hole through, if necessary, a process of review of some nebulous legal opinion.

The aftermath of the death of Mr Mulready Woods also prompted Sinn Féin’s Mary Lou McDonald to state that the party would “review” its long-standing opposition to the non-jury Special Criminal Court. Any such review is absent from the party’s manifesto which prompts speculation that the apparent shift was a top-of-the-head measure to close off any talk that the party is soft on crime at a sensitive time.

Fine Gael would appear to be concentrating so much on the economy it forgot to throw out a few promises to remind people it was once the law-and-order party. The only pledge to demonstrate their toughness is “to increase prison capacity” at a time when the preponderance of penal thinking involves restricting the use of prison.

Another theme common to both Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin is the setting up of new garda units. This would involve imposing these operational units on the garda commissioner, irrespective of his plans to modernise the force.

For instance, Fianna Fáil wants a dedicated transport police, while Sinn Féin is promising a unit to tackle insurance fraud. The Soldiers of Destiny also have provision for a rural crime unit in its manifesto.

When asked about this unit at the manifesto launch, Mr Martin appeared to water its status down to a “forum”, which is basically a talking shop. However, in the seven-way TV leaders’ debate on RTÉ, he appeared to be describing it as an actual unit within An Garda Síochána.

Garda Commissioner Drew Harris must find all of this amusing. If he is forced to set up any of these units, even against his better judgement, will he also have to provide a minimum number of staff?

Garda Commissioner Drew Harris
Garda Commissioner Drew Harris

Otherwise, he might just go along with the political policing and staff the new units with skeletons or dullards.

Fianna Fáil has also managed to resurrect a measure that once upon a time was the first thing you reached for to sate anger.

The party has a proposal for a mandatory minimum sentence for offenders caught with a knife. The Law Reform Commission has opined that these kind of sentences are completely useless in cutting down on crime, but quite obviously Fianna Fáil feels that it still sounds the business and that’s all that matters.

Some of the smaller parties are attempting to tackle crime through evidence-based research rather than the channel of anger.

The Labour party wants to deal as much with the causes of crime and proposes to develop supports to keep young people in marginalised communities on the right track.

The Social Democrats is putting an emphasis on community policing. And People Before Profit is pledging to reach for the stars by ending the system in which the higher courts are only accessible to the wealthy and also putting a stop to the state forking out €500m to private legal firms.

For the greater part, justice and crime are not major issues in this election. The savage murders at the outset of the campaign — including that of Cameron Blair in Cork — prompted some of the parties to reach for an eye-catching measure. Since then, normal fare has resumed.

There are one or two progressive measures promised, but nothing that is going to win votes in any great quantity.

Party promises

    Sinn Féin
  • Bring strength of An Garda Síochána to 16,000
  • Increase Prison Service annual funding by €19.5m to enable disruption of activities and recruitment by organisation gangs
  • Create a sentencing council to issue sentencing guidelines to the judiciary
  • Establish new Garda Youth Diversion projects

    Fianna Fáil
  • Bring Garda strength to a minimum of 16,000 at a cost of €115m
  • Legislate for law in which the belief of a chief supernitendent as to the involvement of an individual in gangland activity will be admissible in evidence
  • Introduce a mandatory minimum 12-month sentence for carrying a knife in public
  • Establish rural crime unit and a specific public transport police within Garda

    Fine Gael
  • Increasing Garda numbers
  • Increasing prison capacity
  • Continue with policing strategy to protect rural Ireland, particularly through Operation Thor
  • Facilitate and promote further links between gardaí and communities

    Labour
  • Establish local commissions to deal with violent drug gangs
  • Develop supports to counteract social and economic marginalisation that underlies involvement of young people in the drug trade
  • Expand the role of the Criminal Assets Bureau
  • Establish a gun crime commission to learn from other jurisdictions the best way to eliminate gun crime

    Social Democrats
  • Invest in community policing
  • Fully implement the Policing Service for the Future plan
  • Make sure hiring of gardaí reflects make-up of population
  • Hire, train and empower gardaí to handle white collar crime and fraud

    Green Party
  • Implement the recommendations of the Commission on the Future of Policing
  • Relocate basic training modules at cadet level to existing third-level institutions and limit the training delivered in Templemore
  • Increase the number of gardaí working in community policing
  • Bring forward legislation providing for an agreed cap to prisoner numbers in all institutions and review current out-of-cell time for prison populations

    People Before Profit
  • End class bias in judicial appointment
  • Create locally elected bodies to oversee An Garda Síochána, including powers of inspection
  • End the practice whereby access to the higher courts is determined by wealth
  • End the practice of the state paying out €500m a year to private law firms

More on this topic

Facebook dropped 'I voted' button after Irish data protection watchdog raised concernsFacebook dropped 'I voted' button after Irish data protection watchdog raised concerns

Coppinger says Seanad should be used to promote progressive causesCoppinger says Seanad should be used to promote progressive causes

Mary Butler apologises for 'huge error of judgment'Mary Butler apologises for 'huge error of judgment'

'Demented and desperate': Brid Smith hits out at Varadkar's Sinn Féin comments'Demented and desperate': Brid Smith hits out at Varadkar's Sinn Féin comments