Bafta admits ‘structural weaknesses’ over racial slur broadcast at film awards

The Bafta Board said an independent review into the incident found issues with “planning, escalation procedures and crisis co-ordination arrangements” for the awards
Bafta admits ‘structural weaknesses’ over racial slur broadcast at film awards

Bafta has apologised after a racial slur shouted by John Davidson was heard at the film awards (Ian West/PA)

Bafta has admitted there were “structural weaknesses” in its planning for the 2026 film awards, which saw a racial slur broadcast.

Disability campaigner John Davidson, who has Tourette’s, could be heard shouting as Sinners stars Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lindo presented an award during the ceremony on February 22, which was broadcast on the BBC with a two-hour time delay.

The Bafta Board said an independent review into the incident found issues with “planning, escalation procedures and crisis co-ordination arrangements” for the awards, but it “did not find evidence of malicious intent on the part of those involved in delivering the event”.

Delroy Lindo was on stage with Michael B Jordan when the slur was heard (Ian West/PA)

A statement from the Bafta Board said: “We apologise unreservedly to the black community, for whom the racist language used carries real pain, brutality, and trauma, to the disability community, including people with Tourette Syndrome, for whom this incident has led to unfair judgment, stigma, and distress; and to all our members, guests at the ceremony and those watching at home.

“What was supposed to be a moment of celebration was diminished and overshadowed. We have written to those directly impacted on the night to apologise.

“The review is clear that while this was not a failure of intent, Bafta’s planning and processes have not kept pace with its diversity and inclusion goals.

“We did not adequately anticipate or fully prepare for the impact of such an incident in a live event environment and as a result our duty of care to everyone at the ceremony and watching at home fell short.”

The academy said work is underway as a “priority” to address the areas of improvement specified in the review, carried out by Rise Associates, to “reduce the risk of this happening again”.

It comes after an investigation found the BBC breached its editorial standards when it broadcast the slur.

An investigation by the BBC’s executive complaints unit (ECU) found the inclusion of the slur was “highly offensive” and “had no editorial justification”, but it added that broadcasting it was unintentional.

It went on to say the slur should have been edited out of the version of coverage available on iPlayer when the event finished, but said a delay of several hours was caused by “a lack of clarity among the team as to whether the N-word was audible on the recording”.

The ECU added that the delay was “a serious mistake, because there could be no certainty that the word would be inaudible to all viewers”.

The report confirmed the BBC’s chief content officer has sent letters of apology to Lindo, Jordan and Davidson.

More in this section

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited