US justice department releases heavily redacted cache of Jeffrey Epstein files
A protest group called "Hot Mess" hold up signs of Jeffrey Epstein in front of the Federal courthouse on July 8, 2019 in New York City. Picture: Stephanie Keith/Getty Images
The Department of Justice on Friday released a long-awaited and huge tranche of documents detailing its investigations into the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, a major development in the lengthy saga that turned into one of the biggest political setbacks Donald Trump has suffered since his re-election last year.
While significant portions of the files are redacted, those that were viewable included images of Epstein socializing with an array of prominent figures, including entertainers like Michael Jackson, Chris Tucker and Diana Ross, and the entrepreneur Richard Branson.Â
Bill Clinton appears in several photos, including one in which he is in a swimming pool along with Epsteinâs convicted accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell. The images also show former British royal Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.
Another cache of documents showed photos of evidence gathered including drives and computers but did not reveal details as to the contents. There was also a photo of what appeared to be a dog in a garbage bag, placed inside a box.
In a letter to Congress, Todd Blanche said the documents, which date back to 2006, when Epstein was investigated on child prostitution charges, were only the first set of what is planned for release. âThe volume of materials to be reviewed ⊠means that the department must publicly produce responsive documents on a rolling basis,â the deputy attorney general wrote in the letter obtained by .
He also acknowledged an array of redactions, including the identifying details of more than 1,200 victims and their family members.

Congressional Democrats accused the Trump administration of failing to adhere to the letter of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires the justice department to release all âunclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materialsâ in its possession related to the financierâs cases by 19 December. Epstein died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal charges of sex-trafficking minors.
The law also requires the justice department to publish any materials from the investigations that relate toMaxwell, who was found guilty in 2021 of aidingEpsteinâs sex trafficking of teen girls and sentenced to 20 years in prison.
âTechnically theyâre not in compliance,â said Democratic congressman Ro Khanna, a leader of the push to get the legislation passed.
âThe law calls for all the documents that are unclassified to be released. They have not done that. The law also calls for them to explain redactions. I havenât seen yet whether theyâve done that or not. My initial read is that they have a lot of redactions without explanation,â Khanna said.
Chuck Schumer, the top Senate Democrat, echoed his concerns, and said in a statement: âWe will pursue every option to make sure the truth comes out.âÂ
Thomas Massie, a Republican, also joined the chorus, writing on social media that the document release âgrossly fails to comply with both the spirit and the letter of the law that [Donald Trump] signed just 30 days agoâ.

Abigail Jackson, the White House deputy press secretary, said the documentsâ release prove that âthe Trump administration is the most transparent in historyâ and said it âhas done more for the victims than Democrats ever haveâ by making the files public and cooperating with a separate congressional investigation.
Epsteinâs case has captivated public attention for years, and been the subject of countless conspiracy theories â largely due to his connections to powerful and wealthy figures in the US and overseas, including Trump.
While he has the authority as president to make the documents public, Trump previously opposed doing so, and said the concern over his ties to Epstein was a âDemocrat hoaxâ. As the House of Representatives neared approval of the bill in November, the president abruptly reversed his position and said Republican lawmakers should support it. It was later passed unanimously by the Senate, and Trump signed the measure into law on 19 November, triggering a 30-day countdown for the documentsâ release.
Although the law mandates the release of unclassified materials, it may not provide the full transparency demanded by numerous Epstein victims, as it does include notable carve-outs, including a provision exempting materials âthat would jeopardize an active federal investigationâ from being released.
The legislation also states that âno later than 15 daysâ after the materials are made public, the justice department must provide Congress with a list of all categories of records released and withheld, a summary of any redactions made, and a list of âall government officials and politically exposed individuals named or referenced in the published materialsâ.

Before the release of the materials, experts also warned that the disclosure of records may not provide a full accounting of Epsteinâs crimes or his network, and that it could still leave many Epstein questions unanswered.
Trump vowed to release Epstein-related files as he campaigned for president last year. This summer, his administration sparked backlash after the justice department announced it would not release any files related to the late financier, and said it had found âno incriminating client listâ despite earlier claims from Pam Bondi, the attorney general, that such a document was sitting on her desk.
The announcement sparked bipartisan outrage â including from some Trump supporters â and reignited scrutiny of Epsteinâs past ties to Trump, with whom he was friendly for at least 15 years before falling out in 2004. The president has consistently denied any knowledge of or involvement in Epsteinâs criminal activities.
In mid-November, several days before Congress voted to release the DoJ files, Democrats on the House oversight committee released three email exchanges they received from Epsteinâs estate in response to a subpoena that dated from 2011, 2015 and 2019, and included one email in which Epstein claimed that Trump âknew about the girlsâ.
Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, dismissed the emails, and accused Democrats of âselectivelyâ leaking them âto create a fake narrative to smear President Trumpâ.

Later that day, Republicans on the committee released over 20,000 documents they received from Epsteinâs estate, including emails between Epstein and prominent figures.
In early December, House Democrats on the committee released several dozen photographs from Epsteinâs estate that highlight his ties to prominent figures, including Trump, Clinton and Mountbatten-Windsor.
Angel UrenÌa, a spokesperson for Bill Clinton, said that the Epstein investigation wasnât about the former president.
âThere are two types of people here,â he said. âThe first group knew nothing and cut Epstein off before his crimes came to light. The second group continued relationships after that. Weâre in the first. No amount of stalling by people in the second group will change that.âÂ
The images represent a small number of the almost 100,000 images given to the House committee, and were released without context or captions.

This week, House Democrats on the committee released another batch of photos from Epsteinâs estate, as the deadline for the DoJ to release its files loomed.
Among the images were photographs of lines from Vladimir Nabokovâs novel Lolita â which is about a middle-aged manâs sexual obsession with and sexual abuse of a 12-year-old girl â written on different parts of a womanâs body. It was reported earlier this year that photos from inside Epsteinâs Manhattan mansion revealed that he kept a first edition copy of Lolita in his office.
The same batch also included photos of travel documents, and notable people like Bill Gates, Woody Allen, Noam Chomsky, and Steve Bannon, Trumpâs former adviser.
The images provided by the estate were undated, and provided without context. The appearance of these people in the photos is not evidence of any wrongdoing.





