Judge holds Rudy Giuliani in contempt of court over Georgia election workers
Rudy Giuliani has been found in contempt of court for continuing to spread lies about two former Georgia election workers after a jury awarded the women a 148 million-dollar (ÂŁ121 million) defamation judgment.
US district judge Beryl Howell in Washington, DC, is the second federal judge this week to find the former New York City mayor in contempt of court.
Judge Howell found Mr Giuliani violated court orders barring him from defaming Wandrea âShayeâ Moss and her mother, Ruby Freeman.
She ordered him to review trial evidence and other materials from the case, and warned him that future violations could result in possible jail.
Ms Moss and Ms Freeman sued Mr Giuliani for defamation for falsely accusing them of committing election fraud in connection with the 2020 election. His lies upended their lives with racist threats and harassment.
Shortly before the hearing began, Mr Giuliani slammed the judge in a social media post, calling her âbloodthirstyâ and biased against him and the proceeding a âhypocritical waste of timeâ.
Mr Giuliani, 80, smiled and chuckled as the judge explained why she was holding him in contempt of court.
Judge Howell said it is âoutrageous and shamefulâ for Giuliani to suggest that he is the one who has been treated unfairly in this case.
âThis takes real chutzpah, Mr Giuliani,â she said.
After the judge finished reading her decision from the bench, Mr Giuliani asked her when she wrote it. He asked her why he had to travel to Washington to attend the hearing if she had already reached a decision in advance.
âRemarkable,â he said.
âIt is remarkable,â the judge replied.
âRemarkable that you can do that in three or four minutes,â Mr Giuliani added.
Mr Giuliani continued to complain about the judge as he left the court.
âIt was a farce,â he said, describing the judge as âcompletely biased and prejudicedâ.
Mr Giuliani briefly gave evidence during Fridayâs hearing, only to authenticate records about his personal finances.
The judge did not fine Mr Giuliani for his most recent defamatory comments about the case, but she said would impose daily fines of 200 dollars (ÂŁ164) if he does not certify within 10 days that he has complied with her order to review trial testimony and other case-related material.
âI donât care what she did. She is a completely farcical judge,â he said outside the courtroom. âShe didnât consider a damn thing I said. She wrote it beforehand.â
A jury sided with the mother and daughter, who are black, in December 2023 and awarded them 75 million dollars (ÂŁ61 million) in punitive damages plus roughly 73 million dollars (ÂŁ59 million) in other damages.
âMr Giuliani started lying about plaintiffs in December of 2020, and refused to stop after repeatedly being told that his election-rigging conspiracy theory about plaintiffs was baseless, malicious, and dangerous,â the plaintiffsâ lawyers wrote.
Mr Giulianiâs lawyers argued that the plaintiffs had not presented âclear and convincingâ evidence that he violated a court order in the defamation case in comments that he made on November podcasts about alleged ballot counting irregularities in Georgia.
âGiuliani acted with the good faith belief that his comments did not violate the (judgment) and he should not be subject to contempt sanctions,â his lawyers wrote.
On Monday in New York, Judge Lewis Liman found Mr Giuliani in contempt of court for related claims that he failed to turn over evidence to help the judge decide whether he can keep a Palm Beach, Florida, condominium.
Mr Giuliani, who testified in Limanâs Manhattan courtroom on January 3, said he did not turn over everything because he believed the requests were overly broad, inappropriate or even a âtrapâ set by plaintiffsâ lawyers.
In the witness box, Ms Moss and Ms Freeman described fearing for their lives after becoming the target of a false conspiracy theory that Mr Giuliani and other Republicans spread as they tried to keep Donald Trump in power after he lost the 2020 election to Democrat Joe Biden.
Ms Moss told jurors she tried to change her appearance, seldom leaves her home and suffers from panic attacks.
âMoney will never solve all my problems,â Ms Freeman told reporters after the juryâs verdict.
âI can never move back into the house that I call home. I will always have to be careful about where I go and who I choose to share my name with. I miss my home. I miss my neighbours, and I miss my name.â




