Washington Post cartoonist quits after sketch of Bezos bowing to Donald Trump rejected
People walk by the One Franklin Square Building, home of The Washington Post. Picture: Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP
A cartoonist has quit her job at the Washington Post after an editor rejected her sketch of the newspaperâs owner and other media executives bowing before President-elect Donald Trump.
Ann Telnaes posted a message on Friday on the online platform Substack saying she drew the cartoon showing a group of media executives bowing before Mr Trump while offering him bags of money, including Post owner and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.
Ms Telnaes wrote that the cartoon was intended to criticise âbillionaire tech and media chief executives who have been doing their best to curry favour with incoming President-elect Trumpâ.
Several executives, Mr Bezos among them, have been spotted at Mr Trumpâs Florida club Mar-a-Lago.
She accused them of having lucrative government contracts and working to eliminate regulations.
Ms Telnaes said she has never before had a cartoon rejected because of its inherent messaging and that such a move is dangerous for a free press.
âAs an editorial cartoonist, my job is to hold powerful people and institutions accountable,â Ms Telnaes wrote.
âFor the first time, my editor prevented me from doing that critical job. So I have decided to leave the Post. I doubt my decision will cause much of a stir and that it will be dismissed because Iâm just a cartoonist. But I will not stop holding truth to power through my cartooning, because as they say âDemocracy dies in darkness.ââ
The Association of American Editorial Cartoonists issued a statement on Saturday accusing the Post of âpolitical cowardiceâ and asking other cartoonists to post Ms Telnaesâ sketch with the hashtag #StandWithAnn in a show of solidarity.
âTyranny ends at pen point,â the association said.
âIt thrives in the dark, and the Washington Post simply closed its eyes and gave in like a punch-drunk boxer.â
The Postâs communications director Liza Pluto provided with a statement from David Shipley, the newspaperâs editorial page editor, in which he said he disagrees with Telnaesâ âinterpretation of events.â
He said he decided to drop the cartoon because the paper had just published a column on the same topic as the cartoon and was set to publish another.
âNot every editorial judgement is a reflection of a malign force⊠The only bias was against repetition,â Mr Shipley said.




