Tesco plans appeal after Lidl scores victory in UK logo fight

Tesco has said it intends to appeal after Lidl scored a victory in a High Court fight over the use of a yellow circle logo.
A judge said on Wednesday that she had found for the German discount supermarket on claims of trademark infringement, passing off and copyright infringement.
Mrs Justice Joanna Smith oversaw a hearing at the High Court in London earlier this year.
Lidl uses a yellow circle in its main logo while Tesco uses a yellow circle logo to promote a Clubcard scheme.
A Lidl spokesman said after the ruling: âWe are pleased that the court has agreed with us.â
A Tesco spokeswoman said: âWe are surprised and disappointed by the decision today in relation to the claim brought by Lidl against our Clubcard Prices logo.â
She added: âWe intend to appeal.â
Mrs Justice Smith said Lidl had made allegations of infringement of registered trademark rights in âLidlâs logo devicesâ, passing off and infringement of copyright.
She said Lidlâs complaint concerned what it described as the âuse by Tesco of an identifier for its Clubcard Prices promotionâ.
âEssentially, Lidl says that Tesco is seeking deliberately to ride on the coat tails of Lidlâs reputation as a âdiscounterâ supermarket known for the provision of value,â said the judge.
âIt is Lidlâs case that the Clubcard Prices promotion was adopted by Tesco as part of a campaign that was designed to improve Tescoâs ability to compete with discounter supermarkets such as Lidl.â
She added: âLidl contends that the deception of Tescoâs customers is not accidental.â

Tesco argued that pursuant to the âClubcard Prices initiativeâ, it used the âsignâ in âvarious guises, always with text overlaidâ and âalways as a signifier of its Clubcard Prices promotionâ.
Mrs Justice Smith said she had found for Lidl on claims of trademark infringement, passing off and copyright infringement.
Tesco had counterclaimed and the judge said she had made a finding in favour of Tesco on its counterclaim.
The judge said: âTesco pursue a counterclaim alleging that some of the Lidl trademarks are liable to be declared invalid on the grounds that they were registered in bad faith, and/or that they should be revoked for non-use and/or that they have no distinctive character.â
She said she had found in favour of Tesco on its âcounterclaim of bad faithâ.
The judge said there had been âno deliberate intention positively to evoke Lidlâ.
But she said that did not mean the design âwas not copied with the focus being on the message that a blue and yellow background would convey for the Clubcard campaignâ.
She said Lidl had relied upon its âtrademark rightsâ in relation to a logo which included the word âLidlâ and a logo without that word.
Tesco had counterclaimed and alleged that âsome of the Lidl trademarksâ were liable to be declared invalid on the grounds that they were âregistered in bad faithâ, or âshould be revoked for non-use and/or that they have no distinctive characterâ.
The judge found that in 1995 a âwordless markâ had been registered âin order to use it as a weapon to secure a wider legal monopoly than it was entitled to, with no genuine intention to use itâ.
She said that was âsufficient to amount to bad faithâ.
A Lidl spokesman said: âWe asked Tesco to change their Clubcard logo, but they refused, making it necessary to bring this case.
âHaving seen the evidence, the court has now ruled that Tescoâs Clubcard logo was copied from Lidlâs logo, and it infringes Lidlâs trademark rights and copyright.â
He went on: âWe are pleased that the court has agreed with us.â
A Tesco spokeswoman added: âThis claim brought by Lidl was just about the colour and shape of the Clubcard Prices logo. The judgeâs ruling concluded that there was no deliberate intent on Tescoâs part to copy Lidlâs trademark.
âIt has no impact on our Clubcard Prices scheme, which we will continue to run in exactly the same way.â