Iranian president sparks outrage with university visit
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad provoked the wrath of New Yorkers as he arrived in the city to make a speech at a prestigious Ivy League university today.
As the president of New Yorkâs Columbia University said the high-profile visit showed âAmerica at its bestâ, others lambasted the Iranian leader as an evil hatemonger and madman.
Mr Ahmadinejad, who has openly called for the destruction of Israel and questioned the scale of the Holocaust, angered New Yorkers last week when he announced plans to visit Ground Zero.
He backed down when the cityâs officials vetoed the trip citing security reasons.
His speech today will come ahead of his annual address to the international community at the UN General Assembly tomorrow.
Speaking to a crowd of protesters outside the university, New York state assemblyman Dov Hikind said: âI call on New Yorkers to make the life of Ahmadinejad, as he is in New York, miserable.â
Mr Hikind said he was âactively encouraging civil disobedienceâ, but not violence.
He went on: âThere is no excuse to invite this madman, this little Hitler.
âThis is immoral. This is outrageous. This is sick.â
Around 100 demonstrators gathered early today carrying banners stating: âDonât give a platform to hate,â and denouncing Mr Ahmadinejad as a âHitler wannabeâ and a Holocaust denier.
Others carried enlarged posters of the Daily News weekend front page with the words âGo to Hell!â around an image of the presidentâs face.
The presidentâs trip comes at a low point in relations between Iran and the United States, which have not had formal diplomatic ties since 1979.
In its editorial headlined âMonstrous idiocyâ today, the New York Daily News attacked Columbia Universityâs dean John Coatsworth, the acting head of the universityâs School of International and Public Affairs, who said he would also have invited Adolf Hitler to speak if he had the chance.
âCoatsworthâs invitation to the Iranian president was a gross abuse of academic freedom that he has been attempting mightily and futilely to defend,â the editorial read.
âBut there is no way, at least in civilised society, to defend Coatsworthâs expressed openness to granting a forum to a man who was the worldâs most determined, most efficient mass murderer.â
The editorial called it an âinsult to Americaâs characterâ.
Earlier, Lee Bollinger, Columbia Universityâs president, described the visit as âAmerica at its bestâ.
âIt should never be thought that merely to listen to ideas we deplore in any way implies our endorsement of those ideas, or the weakness of our resolve to resist those ideas or our naivete about the very real dangers inherent in such ideas,â he said.
âIt is a critical premise of freedom of speech that we do not honour the dishonourable when we open the public forum to their voices. To hold otherwise would make vigorous debate impossible.
âThat such a forum could not take place on a university campus in Iran today sharpens the point of what we do here.
âTo commit oneself to a life â and a civil society â prepared to examine critically all ideas arises from a deep faith in the myriad benefits of a long-term process of meeting bad beliefs with better beliefs and hateful words with wiser words.
âThat faith in freedom has always been and remains today our nationâs most potent weapon against repressive regimes everywhere in the world. This is America at its best.â




