Senate agrees to begin debate on troop withdrawal

Breaking a parliamentary roadblock, the US Senate today voted to begin its first formal debate on the Iraq war since Democrats took control of US Congress in January.

Breaking a parliamentary roadblock, the US Senate today voted to begin its first formal debate on the Iraq war since Democrats took control of US Congress in January. The White House swiftly issued a veto threat.

The 89-9 vote paved the way for consideration of a Democratic measure that calls for, but does not require, President George Bush to pull US combat troops out of Iraq by the end of March 2008.

The vote came after many Republicans abandoned the tactic they had used twice earlier this year to prevent the Senate from considering legislation aimed at forcing an end to the war.

The White House said the resolution “infringes upon the constitutional authority of the president as commander in chief by imposing an artificial timeline to withdraw US troops from Iraq, regardless of the conditions on the ground or the consequences of defeat”, according an administration statement.

Despite the vote, most Republicans opposed the Democratic bill and it was expected to eventually fall short of the 60 votes it will need to pass.

Even so, the debate would give Democrats a chance to put Republicans on record as opposing a timetable on the war at a time when most American voters oppose it.

“This is the message the American people delivered to Congress on November 7, 2006, and this is the message we must send to President Bush,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, referring to an election day in which Democrats captured both chambers.

The Senate breakthrough came after Republicans abandoned demands for assurances that a debate on the war include consideration of various party proposals, including a resolution vowing to protect funding for troops.

Fearful such a measure would undercut the anti-war message Democrats wanted, Senate Democrats had refused.

Confident the latest Democratic proposal would fail, Republicans agreed to let debate begin.

Republicans have argued that Congress should give the troop increase Bush ordered in January time to work.

Bush says the increase – 21,500 combat troops plus thousands of additional support troops – is needed to help stabilise Iraq, where US forces are now commanded by General David Petraeus.

“It is a clear statement of retreat from the support that the Senate only recently gave to General Petraeus,” said Senate Republican Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, contrasting the Democratic measures with the chamber’s recent approval of Petraeus’ nomination as commanding general of the Iraq war.

The Senate measure is weaker than legislation being considered by Democrats in the House of Representatives that would demand troops leave before September 2008.

However, several Senate Democrats have been reluctant to impose a strict deadline on the president.

In the House, Democratic leaders continued to try to rally members behind spending legislation aimed at ending the war.

The House passed a non-binding resolution in February stating opposition to Bush’s decision to send 21,500 more troops to Iraq.

The bill also would demand that the president bring troops home by autumn 2008.

More in this section

Select your favourite newsletters and get the best of Irish Examiner delivered to your inbox