Jackson lawyers argue over evidence admission

Lawyers in the Michael Jackson child molestation trial argued today over whether some documents used in the prosecution case had been sufficiently authenticated to be admitted into evidence.

Jackson lawyers argue over evidence admission

Lawyers in the Michael Jackson child molestation trial argued today over whether some documents used in the prosecution case had been sufficiently authenticated to be admitted into evidence.

The discussion followed District Attorney Tom Sneddon’s announcement yesterday that the prosecution was resting its case, pending Superior Court Judge Rodney Melville’s decisions on admitting various items.

You have reached your article limit. Already a subscriber? Sign in

Continue reading for €5

Unlock unlimited access and exclusive benefits

More in this section

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited