In a stunning reversal, federal prosecutors asked a judge to halt a much-anticipated hearing on their efforts to force Apple to unlock the phone.
The FBI may have found another way, and Apple’s cooperation may no longer be needed, according to court papers.
“An outside party” came forward over the weekend and showed the FBI a possible method to access the data on Syed Rizwan Farook’s encrypted phone, according to the filing.
“Testing is required to determine whether it is a viable method that will not compromise data on Farook’s iPhone,” the filing said.
“If the method is viable, it should eliminate the need for the assistance from Apple.”
If it is viable, that also means the US government has significantly undermined its arguments against Apple, said Kristen Eichensehr, a visiting law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles.
“If they found another way into the phone, that doesn’t just weaken their case.
“It means they can’t satisfy the legal standard to sustain the court’s order,” said Prof Eichensehr, referring to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym’s February 16 ruling compelling Apple to create software that would disable security features on the phone.
Judge Pym granted the government’s request to postpone yesterday’s arguments in the case and stayed her previous order.
She ordered the government to file a status report by April 5.
The development raised more questions than it answered. It’s unclear who is helping the FBI with the phone and why it took so long for a possible solution to be identified.
One thing seems clear — that the government likely would not have disclosed it had found another possible way to unlock the phone unless it was almost certain the method would work, said Robert Cattanach, a former US Department of Justice attorney who handles cyber-security cases for the Dorsey & Whitney law firm.
Lawmakers, civil rights advocates, and other tech companies have criticised the FBI for not doing more to try to crack the iPhone itself before seeking to force Apple’s hand.