Uber hails ruling as ‘victory for sense’

Minicab app firm had been challenged by London taxi drivers

Uber has welcomed a ruling that its minicab-hailing app is lawful, saying the decision is “great news for Londoners and a victory for common sense”.

A High Court judge rejected accusations from the black cab trade that the smartphone app constituted a fare calculation meter reserved for use in vehicles used by licensed cabbies.

Mr Justice Ouseley, sitting in London, ruled Uber apps did not constitute taximeters and there was nothing to prevent minicab drivers and their customers enjoying “any improvement which technology might bring in the speed and accuracy of their fare calculations”.

Jo Bertram, regional general manager for Uber in the UK, Ireland and the Nordics, said: “This is great news for Londoners and a victory for common sense.”

But the groundbreaking ruling foreshadows other battles looming in London over the Uber phenomenon, which has caused controversy and triggered legal battles in many of the world’s major cities.

Uber is opposing separate proposals to tighten private hire regulation in the capital following Transport for London’s launch of a consultation on a series of measures that would affect minicab drivers.

London mayor Boris Johnson welcomed the court ruling and declared himself “a strong supporter of new technology”.

But his spokesman added there were “huge challenges for the taxi and private hire trades, as well as legitimate concerns over increased vehicle emissions and congestion”.

He said that was why Mr Johnson was lobbying the Government “to give TfL the power to cap the numbers that can operate in our city”.

Government figures show the number of minicabs in the capital has risen by over a quarter (26%) in the past two years, to 62,800.

The mayor’s spokesman also said TfL had commissioned “a broad based consultation to seek views about how we ensure we have regulations that are fit for the 21st century”.

Proposals include the introduction of an interval of at least five minutes between a booking and the start of a journey, to allow drivers to plan an appropriate route.

Other proposals involve a requirement for drivers to pass an English language test and a map reading assessment, while firms might have to operate a fixed landline telephone and accept bookings up to seven days in advance.

Urging TfL to reconsider, Mr Bertram said on behalf of Uber: “Now the High Court has ruled in favour of new technology, we hope Transport for London will think again on their bureaucratic proposals for apps like Uber.

“Compulsory five-minute waits and banning ride-sharing would be bad for riders and drivers.

“These plans make no sense. That’s why 130,000 people have already signed our petition against these proposals.”