Human Rights Watch pans trial

The prosecution’s evidence in a trial this month of 51 alleged Muslim Brotherhood supporters in Egypt relied on the testimony of one police officer, says Human Rights Watch.

Human Rights Watch pans trial

The human rights group said the prosecution had presented little evidence to show the defendants did anything other than spread news about a mass sit-in in Rabaa square in 2013 and organise peaceful protests.

The court on April 11 had condemned 14 men to death and 37 others to a life sentence for their actions in opposition to the ousting of Islamist president Mohamed Mursi in 2013 by the military under Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, who is now president.

The human rights group’s criticism of Egypt’s judiciary comes ahead of a separate trial involving Mursi in which he could face a possible death sentence.


Since taking office in 2014, Sisi has identified Mursi’s Muslim Brotherhood as a threat to national security. He has described the outlawed Brotherhood as part of a network of violent Islamist groups that pose a threat to the Arab world and the West.

The Brotherhood denies the allegations and says it is a peaceful movement determined to reverse a military coup that ousted Mursi.

Egyptian courts have sentenced hundreds of alleged Brotherhood supporters to death in mass trials. The charges in last week’s trial ranged from publishing false news to planning to spread chaos. Those sentenced to death included Brotherhood leader Mohamed Badie.

The court also gave a life term to Mohamed Soltan, a US-Egyptian citizen, in a decision condemned by the White House. The sentences can be appealed.

A foreign ministry spokesman rejected the Human Rights Watch statement as “completely wrong again” and said Egypt had a fully independent judicial system with an appeals process.


More in this section


Select your favourite newsletters and get the best of Irish Examiner delivered to your inbox