American Airlines shoe-bomber Richard Reid has ‘tactical regrets’

More than 13 years after his failed attempt to blow up a plane with explosives hidden in his shoes, Richard Reid told US researchers he believes his actions were permissible under Islamic law, according to newly-released correspondence.

American Airlines shoe-bomber Richard Reid has ‘tactical regrets’

Reid, who is serving a life sentence in a federal prison in Colorado because of the attack, was foiled in his 2001 bid to blow up an American Airlines flight from Paris to Miami when passengers and crew overpowered him as he tried to ignite explosives in his shoes.

Reid said he now has only “tactical regrets”.

The attempted attack in December 2001 came as the US was on heightened alert following the September 11, 2001 attacks and prompted federal officials to institute stricter security rules for travellers requiring airline passengers to run their shoes through a screening device.

“I do believe my actions to have been permissible in Islamic law, although I admit that many people would dispute that and disagree with me on that point,” Reid wrote in one of a series of letters with researchers from the Virginia-based Justitia Institute who reached out to him last June.

“However, at the same time I also believe that it wasn’t supposed to happen, not because it was displeasing to Go ... and rather because (a) it was not either my time to die nor that of those on the plane with me and (b) He had other plans for me which include my staying in prison,” he wrote in a letter signed with the name Abdur-Raheem.

Reid, a British citizen who is now 41, pleaded guilty in 2002 to multiple charges including attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction and attempted murder.

Kim Mehlman-Orozco, a researcher and board member at Justitia Institute, which researches criminal and social justice issues, said her team was not surprised Reid had maintained his militant views after over a decade behind bars. She said: “It speaks to the level of motivation, because it defies time, it defies rationality, it supersedes his will to live, his will for freedom.”

Saif Inam, policy analyst at the Muslim Public Affairs Council in Washington, said Reid’s contention that his attempted attack was allowed by Islamic law was “100% unequivocally, theologically untenable.”

More in this section

IE_logo_newsletters

Select your favourite newsletters and get the best of Irish Examiner delivered to your inbox