A series of events will be held by miners, their families, supporters and union activists in the coming weeks, while the anger and bitterness which characterised the dispute will be rekindled.
The recent revelation in government papers released by the National Archives that Margaret Thatcher secretly considered calling out the troops at the height of the strike has heightened the belief that a full-blown inquiry should be held.
Labour MP Ian Lavery, a former president of the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM), has tabled an early day motion in Parliament, which “regrets that nearly 30 years after the strike ended, there are still men who were wrongly arrested or convicted during the dispute, who have never received justice”.
More than 60 MPs are supporting the motion.
Mr Lavery said he would continue pressing for an inquiry into the events of 30 years ago.
He told the Press Association: “People who live in great mining communities across the UK have not forgotten the strike and they will never forget.
“Passions have not waned. In 100 years time I am confident that people will say that their great-grandfather was a miner and was proud to have taken part in the strike. That is how deep this thing runs.”
Mr Lavery said the archive papers, revealing that ministers considered declaring a state of emergency, amid fears that union action could destroy the government, backed up his belief that MPs and the public were misled.
The strike started in early March 1984 over pit closures planned by the state-owned National Coal Board and pitted Mrs Thatcher’s government against the NUM and its fiery president Arthur Scargill.
Mr Scargill always maintained that the government planned mass pit closures as well as attacking the union, a sentiment which was backed up by a now-released note from an official at 10 Downing Street that said the strike was a “unique opportunity to break the power of the militants in the NUM”.