Saudi judge asks medics to paralyse convict
Saudi Arabia enforces strict Islamic law and occasionally metes out punishments based on the ancient legal code of an eye-for-an-eye.
Abdul-Aziz al-Mutairi, 22, was left paralysed after a fight more than two years ago and asked a judge to impose an equivalent punishment on his attacker under Islamic law.
A newspaper, Okaz, said the judge in northwestern Tabuk province, Saoud bin Suleiman al-Youssef, asked at least two hospitals for a medical opinion on whether surgeons could render the attacker’s spinal cord nonfunctional.
The attacker, who was not identified, has spent seven months in jail.
The reports cited the letter of response from one of the hospitals and the victim, al-Mutairi.
Okaz reported that a leading hospital in Riyadh — King Faisal Specialist Hospital — responded that it could not do the operation.
It quoted a letter from the hospital saying “inflicting such harm is not possible,” apparently refusing on ethical grounds.
The papers did not carry any response from a second hospital that reportedly received the request, King Khaled Hospital in Tabuk province.
The story was also carried by Saudi English-language paper Arab News.
Islamic law applied in Saudi Arabia allows defendants to ask for a similar punishment for harms inflicted on them. Cutting off the hands of thieves, for example, is common.
Under the law, the victim can receive blood money to settle the case.
Human rights group say trials in Saudi Arabia fall far below international standards. They usually take place behind closed doors and without adequate legal representation.
Those who are sentenced to death are often not informed of the progress of legal proceedings against them or of the date of execution until the morning on which they are taken out and beheaded.
Crucifying the headless body in a public place is a way to set an example, according to the kingdom’s strict interpretation ofIslam.
Saudi King Abdullah has been trying to clamp down on extremist ideology, including unauthorised clerics issuing odd religious decrees.





