Scientists make progress toward artificial life
The move, which comes after five years of research, is seen as the penultimate stage in the endeavour to create an artificial life form based entirely on a man-made DNA genome — something which has tantalised scientists for years.
“Through dedicated teamwork we have shown that building large genomes is now feasible and scalable so that important applications such as biofuels can be developed,” said Hamilton Smith, from the J Craig Venter Institute, in the study published in Science.
The research has been carried out at the laboratories of the controversial celebrity US scientist Craig Venter, who has hailed artificial life forms as a potential remedy to illness and global warming.
However, the prospect of engineering artificial life forms is highly controversial and is likely to arouse heated debate over the ethics and potential ramifications of such an advance.
Mr Venter said in a statement: “This extraordinary accomplishment is a technological marvel that was only made possible because of the unique and accomplished team.”
His researchers had “dedicated the last several years to designing and perfecting new methods and techniques that we believe will become widely used to advance the field of synthetic genomics”, he added.
Lead author Dan Gibson said the team had completed the second step in a three-step process to create a synthetic organism.
In the final stage of their research, which they are already working on, the Maryland-based team will attempt to create a bacteria based purely on the synthetic genome sequence of the Mycoplasma genitalium bacteria.
The bacteria, which causes certain sexually transmitted diseases, has one of the least complex DNA structures of any life form, composed of just 580 genes.
In contrast, the human genome has some 30,000.
In the final step of the process, the chromosome will be transplanted into a living cell where it should “take control”, effectively becoming a new life form.
But other scientists remain cautious, saying Mr Venter and his team are still a long way from being able to create artificial life. They point to a tell-tale footnote in the study, which details a problem in slotting in one of the cloned genes.
Eckard Wimmer, professor of molecular biology at New York University, said it was clear from the study the team had not yet created artificial life.
He said he was left with “the unpleasant feeling whether or not the synthetic DNA was indeed proper and able for biological function”.
His fears were echoed by Helen Wallace, a biologist and spokesperson for GeneWatch UK, who said while Mr Venter’s team has managed a technical feat, it is some way from being artificial life.
“Venter is not God... He’s a long way from creating life,” she said.




