Bolivia declares martial law to quell bloody protests
Roman Catholic priest Asensio Mamani said he saw three people killed in the clashes in his neighbourhood, Senakata, on Sunday. Another priest, Modesto Chino, said two demonstrators were also killed in the Ballivian neighbourhood.
Those deaths would bring the total killed to 16 in El Alto since the clashes began. The government earlier reported that 11 people had been killed.
That figure included a 7-year-old boy killed by a stray bullet.
Hospital and human rights groups officials said some 30 people were hurt in El Alto, a poor industrial city 10 miles outside the capital, La Paz.
The demonstrators are angry about a plan proposed by President Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada to export gas from Bolivia’s mammoth reserves in the southern region of Tarija to the United States and Mexico.
Government officials estimate the gas exports would generate about $1.5 billion for Bolivia, South America’s poorest nation. But union leaders and Bolivia’s poor Indian majority, which has frequently led protests against government attempts to privatise the state industries, argue the economic benefits won’t reach them.
The demonstrations are the latest to plague Sanchez de Lozada, who has faced a series of violent protests by workers and indigenous leaders opposed to his free-market policies. He grew up in the US and has staked much of his political fortunes on his relationship with the Bush administration.
Presidential spokesman Mauricio Antezana accused demonstrators of trying to overthrow the government, an allegation the administration has made previously. Antezana said the military decided to lock down El Alto after demonstrators attacked soldiers Saturday night with firearms and rocks.
He said martial law was necessary “to ensure the safety of its citizens and protect public and private properties”.
The protesters are partly upset that the government might decide to ship the gas out of a port in Chile. Bolivia has been a landlocked nation since it lost its coastline in a 1879 war against Chile, and resentment against its neighbour is still strong.
The government calls the protests unjustified, saying details of the project aren’t even finished yet. Sanchez de Lozada, while admitting that a Chilean port would be technically and economically more convenient, has said that he would prefer a Peruvian port.





