Subscriber

Cathal Dennehy: The old, outdated status quo had to crumble eventually.

The IOC can go on about Olympic ideals, that this pursuit is more noble than the greasy professionalism that pervades sport elsewhere, but if that’s the case they should probably stop giving executive board members per diems of $900 while at events.
BRAVE MOVE: With the decision to award prize money in Paris, Sebastian Coe has launched a grenade into the Olympic movement, one that’s left many seething. In all honesty, it was long overdue. Pic: AP Photo//Michel Euler, File

BRAVE MOVE: With the decision to award prize money in Paris, Sebastian Coe has launched a grenade into the Olympic movement, one that’s left many seething. In all honesty, it was long overdue. Pic: AP Photo//Michel Euler, File

The response was predictable, a rebuke as swift as it was strident from various authorities in their attempt to maintain the status quo. To rage against the dying light of amateurism at the Olympic Games.

It was only a matter of hours after World Athletics announced it would pay prize money at this year’s Paris Games that the International Olympic Committee (IOC) jumped into defensive mode, reminding everyone that it “redistributes 90% of all its income, in particular to the National Olympic Committees and International Federations”, adding it’s up to them “how to best serve their athletes and the global development of their sport.” 

This is exclusive subscriber content. Already a subscriber? Sign in

Unlimited access starts here.

Try from only €0.25 a day.

Cancel anytime

More in this section

Sport

Newsletter

Sign up to our daily sports bulletin, delivered straight to your inbox at 5pm. Subscribers also receive an exclusive email from our sports desk editors every Friday evening looking forward to the weekend's sporting action.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited