Hurling 2020: Key Proposals

Verdict: Most needed.
Matter for: Central Council.
Chances of success: Great
Verdict: Tried before but more powerful role now.
Matter for: Central Council.
Chances of success: Good
Verdict: Common sense and exciting.
Matter for: Congress.
Chances of success: Good
Verdict: Punishes foul play close to goal.
Matter for: Congress.
Chances of success: Good
Verdict: A long time coming.
Matter for: Congress.
Chances of success: Good
Verdict: A long time coming.
Matter for: Central Council.
Chances of success: Good
Verdict: Understandable but a little snobbish?
Matter for: Central Council.
Chances of success: Dubious
Verdict: The most contentious of the lot. Could add to cynicism and what about six substitutes to reflect it?
Matter for: Congress.
Chances of success: Dubious
Verdict: A lot of support in traditional counties for this idea.
Matter for: Central Council.
Chances of success: Decent
Verdict: Major boost for developing hurling counties.
Matter for: Congress.
Chances of success: Decent
Verdict: Yes, oh yes.
Matter for: Central Council/CCCC.
Chances of success:Good
Verdict: Exactly type of promotion the competition needs. Matter for: Central Council/CCCC. Chances of success: Great
Verdict: Ties in with FRC proposal.
Matter for: Congress.
Chances of success: Good.
Verdict: Logical.
Matter for: CCCC.
Chances of success: Good.
Verdict: Gets our backing but will traditionalists like it?
Matter for: Central Council.
Chances of success: Dubious.