The questions John Delaney needs to answer

He just had to be involved, didn’t he? 

The questions John Delaney needs to answer

Amidst one of the biggest ever scandals to envelop and overthrow in any sporting sphere, there was no way John Delaney couldn’t march the FAI into the midst of it, making global headlines that should have been way beyond our limited means.

Even by the chief executive’s own standards — and this is a man with a penchant for taking up swathes of ink — this was quite a coup. After all, he’s made our association one of the most complicit with the way Fifa went about their business and one of the biggest beneficiaries of their beyond shady ways.

In typical Delaney fashion though, he’s tried to deflect from the issue by confronting reality square on. Ever since Sepp Blatter resigned, he’s been telling anyone who’d listen that he was the renegade that refused to bow, shoeless John taking on the designer suits of corruption all by himself. Really though, it’s made him seem like a bullied schoolboy who tells his friends he won the fight, but only after his tormenter moved out of town. Certainly there were no tales told while Blatter was still in power and, far worse, he kneeled at the altar courtesy of his shocking decisions and actions. It allows us to add hypocrite to a lengthy list of charges — but that should be the least of Delaney’s worries now.

Let’s make this clear. In 2009, when accepting money in the shadows, John Delaney and the FAI assisted Blatter in his method of repugnant governance. By taking the cheque and signing a confidentiality agreement, they became a massive part of the problem, allowing Fifa to operate in the very way they’re fawning outrage over all week. We can criticise Concacaf and Caf all we want, but we are now no better.

Delaney can label it how he likes too, but we all know what the €5m represented. It was hush money to stop being a nuisance. Delaney even said he’d have taken €10m if it had been on the table but that just goes to show a lack of understanding and a lack of morals.

Some questions for John Delaney that I’d like to ask. Does he understand the fabric of football, given a refereeing mistake saw him threaten a case at the Court of Arbitration for Sport? If he felt so strongly, why trade his beliefs for euros? Was he just chancing his arm and if so is that any way for a professional in a position of high diplomacy to act? Did he not think a confidentiality agreement tends to mean something is off or did he just presume we’d never know? Does he believe that the brand of the FAI has been hugely damaged yet again? And does he not think enough is enough and it’s time to resign?

Of course we can’t ask him any of that, because Delaney tends not to talk to the sports media. He only chatters to showbiz journalists.

Meanwhile, those sports writers who understand the severity of the situation were at the Champions League final discussing it. Any from the UK and the continent we spoke to agreed that had Delaney been part of their association, he’d be gone.

But not in Ireland where some even see what he did as a badge of honour. It’s typical of our political outlook, an extension of the same attitude we never learned from despite getting a whooping from the Celtic Tiger. In essence, the very same people moralising about the corruption in Fifa saw getting €5m into our bank account as a great piece of business. Thus we’ve no shame, as when it comes to staring in the mirror we’ve a different set of standards. And, when it comes to judging ourselves, what matters it’s not the why or how but the how much.

Emerging counties failed by hurling chiefs

More in this section

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited