I’ve been accused of doping, but I’m innocent, says Irish athlete
Colvert was set to compete in the 100m, 200m and 4x100m relay but his âAâ sample was found to have an âadverse analytical findingâ for the substance ârecombinant erythropoietinâ more commonly known as EPO and typically used by distance runners as a performance enhancing drug.
The Crusaders athlete narrowly missed out on the London 2012 Olympics in the 200m by two hundredths of a second, running 20.57 seconds â just shy of the 20.55 required. He is adamant he has never taken the substance or any other performance-enhancing drug. Colvert, a third year law student in DCU, is now looking to get his âBâ sample tested to clear his name and find out what led to the positive test.
Speaking exclusively to the Irish Examiner yesterday, Colvert, who has seasonâs bests of 20.90 for the 200m and 10.58 for the 100m, explained the series of events leading to his positive test and the measures he will take to clear his name.
âI was in an exam in DCU on May 20 when drugs testers from the Irish Sports Council met me outside the exam hall and notified me that I had to take an out of competition test and I duly provided urine and blood samples. I thought nothing of it until I was informed two days ago [June 17] that there had been an adverse analytical finding for EPO in the urine sample only.
âIt all just feels like a really bad dream or a horrible prank.â
âIn general I donât take any supplements except for during that exam period where I took a generic multivitamin [Activ-Max], which can be bought off the shelf in Aldi because I was feeling run down from my exams. I also took an iron supplement called Galfer which I purchased over the counter in a pharmacy. I took one tablet of each supplement two days before the test.
âI normally donât take any supplements. I source my protein from whole foods such as eggs, meat and cheese. I donât take any recovery or energy drinks or creatine or any supplements in general.â
âIâm going to seek to have the B sample tested along with giving my full co-operation to the Irish Sports Council and all the relevant bodies involved in the investigations. Iâm happy to provide any extra drugs tests, provide financial statements and take any forensic test above and beyond whatâs required in order to vindicate my name. I firmly believe there has been some sort of error or false positive.
âIâm part of the programme in which they keep all of my samples for 10 years and Iâm happy to go back and let them test every single sample ever provided â both in competition and out of competition.â
âEveryone is entitled to his or her own opinion. Iâm sure there are people who will want to burn me at the stake for a failed âAâ sample. Personally I would be suspicious of someone who has failed an âAâ sample so I understand where people will be coming from when they read this.
âMost peopleâs natural inclination is to think that a person is guilty but there are a number of cases in the past where an âAâ sample has been a false positive. Olympic 1500m silver medallist [2004] Bernard Lagat failed an A sample for EPO in 2003 and the B sample proved that it was a false positive. There are many athletes who have had similar cases for the same substance and been vindicated.
âIâm flabbergasted by the findings. If it was pseudoephedrine or a stimulant thatâs easily found in things like Lemsip then I could try and remember had I inadvertently taken something.
âIâm coming forward with this finding because I have nothing to hide and Iâm happy to have complete transparency into the whole ordeal.â
Erythropoietin, more commonly know as EPO, is a drug that boosts your red blood cells and as a result your oxygen carrying or aerobic capacity. While some sprinters have been found to have adverse findings for the substance, it is more commonly taken by endurance athletes such as distance runners and cyclists. Human Growth Hormone and steroids would be more typical performance enhancing drugs taken by 100m and 200m sprinters.



