McQuaid defends UCI in Armstrong scandal

The International Cycling Union (UCI) was fault free in their handling of the Lance Armstrong doping affair that severely tarnished the sport’s reputation and triggered harsh criticism of the federation, UCI president Pat McQuaid said.

Speaking at an international sports conference in Russia, McQuaid said the UCI had always been at the forefront in the battle against doping during the American’s years of domination from the late 1990s to the mid-2000s.

“I do not think the UCI made mistakes,” said McQuaid, who took over as president in 2005, the year of Armstrong’s last Tour de France victory.

“The statistics show the UCI was the most advanced in the fight against doping.”

Cancer survivor Armstrong was stripped of his seven Tour de France titles and banned for life from cycling in 2012 after a report by the United State Anti-doping Agency (USADA) accused him of doping for years.

In January, Armstrong admitted in a television interview that he used banned substances in all of his Tour victories.

“I was fooled,” McQuaid said. “I believed there was no way a man so close to death would go and start putting stuff into his body that could be dangerous.

Critics accused the UCI of not doing enough to catch the American, who faced several years of doping accusations, while the USADA report also alleged that the body could have done more.

McQuaid, seeking a third term as UCI president, defended his organisation by saying the UCI had tested Armstrong 200 times between 1999 and 2005, while USADA had only conducted 12 tests.

However, he admitted the tests were no match for the advanced methods used by Armstrong.

“There were no tests available for the products. Ten or 15 years ago the armoury (against doping) was weaker.

McQuaid said he was still waiting for an apology from Armstrong and hoped the American would give back to the sport by helping with inquiries.

“I would like to see him jump on his private plane and come to Switzerland (UCI headquarters) and say ‘what can I do?’ “He has not apologised to the sport of cycling. Everyone accepts he has not come clean. If he has information he has to come forward.”