Learning a lesson from US dilemma
Ben McGrath of that magazine had a thought-provoking piece last week on sports rules, and more specifically, the driving impulse to change rules in American sports.
Some of the instances cited were eerily familiar â his starting point was the retirement of ice hockey keeper Martin Brodeur, whose particular skills led to redrawing of NHL legislation.
Others were familiar to me, if nobody else â McGrath said: âAnother of the leagueâs proposed solutions was a no-brainer: asking the referees to enforce the written rules.â
Generally speaking, this is an area of some elasticity in every physical-contact sport, with officials inclined to allow some leeway to players competing at the highest level.
However, in this regard McGrath was referring to was âthe increasing tendency, across the league, of defensive players to impede the skating progress of offensive players through âclutching and grabbingâ.
âTechnically illegal, just like travelling in basketball, hockeyâs hooking and interfering tactics had spread gradually, like a plague, with the refereesâ tacit endorsement.â
If you can imagine that point being made in this newspaper by a former Cork hurling goalkeeper in his column, then you will see why this piece was half interesting article, half echo chamber for many points made here.
It wonât come as a surprise to anyone interested in US sports to hear McGrath cite hockey team ownersâ concerns that their league is less interesting to spectators because of the relative decline in scoring. This makes it less attractive, and less lucrative, a spectacle.
Donât all groan at once. The sports-business Darwinism practised in the US wouldnât fit most models in this country, but isnât there a cold-shower freshness to an attitude which takes the entertainment value of a sport as important?
Itâs not as if that isnât a consideration across the spectrum. The National Football League is in full swing, and following on from the grim fare in much of last yearâs championship one would hope for an improvement in the spectacle; odd, then, that the (relatively) sweeping changes being mooted are in hurling.
Consider this: why are rule changes implemented in sports in the first place?
Is improving how the game looks that far from the law-changersâ mindset? Does greater legislative accuracy naturally produce a spectacle which is more aesthetically pleasing?
Are we conditioned to see a âfairerâ game as prettier?
Answers on a postcard. Hopefully your insights arenât lost in the centre pages of The New Taxidermy.
Mr Jackie Cahill, freelance journalist at large, caused the bottom to drop out of my world the other evening, and the world nearly dropped out of my bottom, for good measure.
When Jackie tweeted Kilmallock were to play Portaferry not in Thurles, but in Mullingar, it just... spoiled everything.
My car is like Barry Fitzgeraldâs horse Napoleon: once it goes through the Jack Lynch Tunnel, you just have to point it north and it finds its way to Semple Stadium anyway.
Mullingar? Does it even exist, I thought? As it happens, I neednât have worried. The capital of Westmeath was charming and the game enjoyable, so my snootiness about the place was misjudged. Sorry, Mullingar.
And anyway, itâs not always been a bed of roses in Thurles. A few months ago I was wending my way over to the dog track after a game, where I customarily park, and noticed that the large iron gates were shut.
Ah, Thomas Kinsella: locked fast inside a dream with iron gates, eh? A sharp Anglo-Saxon expletive. Delays. A cold evening, getting colder. The road home getting darker and darker.
But wait: a phone number on the billboard inside the gate, and when I rang that I got an answering machine, unsurprisingly, on a Sunday evening, but the message ended with a mobile number âin case of emergencyâ.
Triumph. I only had to ring the number three or four times before I memorised the mobile, and when I rang, the call was quickly picked up.
âWell.â
âHi, just ringing from outside the dog track here in Thurles, my carâs been locked inside.â
âRight. Locked?â
With a terrible, terrible sensation in my stomach I came closer to the gate. It was closed, certainly, but without a padlock of any shape or size.
âYeah, itâs okay, actually. (Coughs) Sorry to disturb.â
âNo bother.â
Thurles, bro. The finest.
Item: Lawrence Taylor was 56 last week. 56!
He wore the number 56 jersey for the New York Giants in the NFL and in his prime, he was a force of nature, but his... chaotic lifestyle off the field meant there was general surprise he made it to his mid-50s.
That general surprise extended to Taylor himself, by the way.
âItâs hard to believe that I GOT to 56, yes,â he told the New York Post, âbut Iâm here. Donât get me wrong â it hasnât been an easy road.â
There have been problems with drugs along the way, but apparently Taylor is a more settled person now.
If you only know him from Any Given Sunday (he was Luther âSharkâ Lavay), then you may not be aware of how intimidating a presence he was in real games.
âI mean, everything you did was predicated to where he was and what he was doing,â said one opponent â John Elway.
âThe best defensive football player Iâve seen,â said Howie Long.
Happy birthday to LT. 56!
In the Nobody Asked Me, But section today... there will be a mass on Thursday morning in St Augustineâs Church, Cork, in memory of firefighter Dick Beecher, who died in the line of duty, 40 years ago, on February 14.
He died right across the street from that church, and a small plaque commemorates the building where it happened.
I met Dick once, when I was a small child, but I never forgot him: he gave me a present of some pencils when my father introduced me to him.
He passed away just a few days later. Remember him in your prayers today.





