Irish language was marginalised by history

YOUR correspondent, Padraig Óg Ó Ruairc (‘If Maltese is a European language, why not Irish?, Irish Examiner letters, June 22) seems to miss the point of my letter (‘Irish language will never be the talk of Europe, Irish Examiner, June 15).

Irish language was marginalised by history

The fanatics I referred to were those who were blind to the reality of the true status of Irish, not someone like Pádraig who has gone to the trouble of learning what should have been his natural inheritance if history had been kinder to Ireland.

If independence had been achieved say 100 years earlier, then the language might have stood a chance.

But history is history and can’t be changed, so, unfortunately, Irish became one of its many casualties.

For Irish to make a revival there has to be the will of the people behind it and the evidence is clear as day that the vast majority are not interested.

They don’t want to get rid of it, but they don’t want to speak it either. People like Pádraig are thin on the ground and get thinner by the year.

He’s right. I don’t object to Maltese as an EU working language because all citizens of Malta speak Maltese.

Irish, however, is not spoken by the vast majority of the Irish people, so his argument that more people speak Irish than Maltese is very weak.

Padraig, as an Irish speaker, chose to write his letter in English. Case closed.

Jim Yates

93 Cill Cais

Old Bawn

Dublin 24

x

More in this section

Revoiced

Newsletter

Sign up to the best reads of the week from irishexaminer.com selected just for you.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited