Irish Examiner view: A cargo full of love and devotion for Irish athletes
Paul O'Donovan and Fintan McCarthy of Team Ireland celebrate with fans after winning the men's lightweight double sculls finals. Picture: Brendan Moran/Sportsfile
We may regret the need for Garda to be equipped with body cameras — currently being piloted in divisions in Dublin and Limerick — which carries us further into the world of Robocop.
But while there are worries about the eventual integration of AI-driven facial recognition systems and their influence on the administration of justice there is no argument that police services need a full record of their actions. And particularly in a world where everything they do is being captured on mobile phone cameras.
In recent coverage of unrest, it is social media footage, often selectively edited, which defines the narrative. The riots in Parnell Square last November and in Coolock earlier this month; the disgraceful scenes following the Southport tragedy; the street fighting generated by graphic shots of police in action at Manchester Airport — all are examples of the tinder box nature of contemporary society.
It is a sign of public sensitivities to the deployment of such technology that Commissioner Drew Harris felt obligated to explain the penalties which would face rogue Garda members if they abused the system.
Mr Harris confirmed that they will face dismissal from the force, and potential criminal prosecution, if they are found to have shared or leaked footage of incidents captured on Garda body-worn cameras.
Mr Harris said the system is “secure” and cannot be tampered with or altered, but acknowledged that recordings could be taken from a third-party screen, such as a mobile phone, and shared with others.
This has happened in other jurisdictions. In 2022 Metropolitan Police officers who “dehumanised” two black female victims “for their own amusement” by taking and sharing photos on WhatsApp from a scene they had been sent to guard were jailed for two years and nine months each.
But Comm Harris, speaking at the launch of the system in Limerick, said: “An investigating member obviously has to review the footage in terms of preparing a file, so if somebody really wants to act outside our rules and instructions and indeed our discipline code, then on their head be it.” The initial projects, which are testing three different types of kit, are costing ¢3m. Trials are shortly to be extended to Waterford.
Mr Harris revealed that gardaí had secured “48 pieces of evidential footage” from a single deployment of members to the Coolock riots.
Gardaí have reported to headquarters that the cameras are also helping members “diffuse situations” as well as providing “very important evidence during arrests in terms of drink-driving, searches, domestic abuse incidents, and incidents of sexual assaults where you are recording the first complaint of the victim.” Justice Minister Helen McEntee intends to push on with plans to deploy face recognition technology to “free up Garda resources” by doing away with the current system-trawl through thousands of hours of footage obtained from multiple sources.
This is of a different order of magnitude and the public will be more cautious because the technology has had mixed results elsewhere. But as far as closed body cameras are concerned it is likely to support the view that the Devil should not have all the best tunes, or indeed the best equipment.






