No wonder people are sceptical

Nobody is likely to have been surprised that Mr Justice Feargus Flood concluded in his third interim report that George Redmond received corrupt payments, or that he and other people hindered the work of the Flood Tribunal.

No wonder people are sceptical

Those who are found to have obstructed the tribunal’s work should certainly not have their legal expenses paid by the State.

In fact, such people should be compelled to contribute significantly towards the State’s legal expense, and they should have to face the rigours of the law for any criminal misconduct, whether that is for the bribery involved in corrupt payments, or perjury in relation to misleading testimony before the tribunals.

You have reached your article limit. Already a subscriber? Sign in

Unlimited access starts here.

Try from only €0.25 a day.

Cancel anytime

More in this section

Revoiced

Newsletter

Had a busy week? Sign up for some of the best reads from the week gone by. Selected just for you.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited