Frank Serpico: 'I call it rats jumping off a sinking ship'
Frank Serpico, right, testifies before a police corruption hearing in 1971.
Serpico is bleeding. He is in the back of a patrol car, eyes wide open, a man on the precipice of mortality. He has been shot in the face. A siren wails, windscreen wipers beat against a dirty New York night. He is being rushed to hospital. The rain buckets down, on the city, on Serpicoâs life, on a career that began so brightly, on the tarnished reputation of the New York Police Department which he exposed as being riddled with corruption. So goes the opening scene of , the eponymous movie of Frank Serpicoâs life in which Al Pacino played the whistleblower cop.
Serpico was shot on the night of February 3, 1971. Over 50 years later, the bullet is still lodged in his head. He lives today in a log cabin in upstate New York, out in the wild, communing with nature but still railing against injustice.Â

He is 85 now, but, over a call from his home, he sounds ready for road, fit to take on anything that has the smell of corruption off it.
âIâm getting on very well, thank you Mike,â he says of his day. âI love all things Irish, especially a little Jameson. The first thing I learned as a young man was âErin go brachâ.Â
"Listen, growing up, I hung out with a bunch of Irish kids.â
He also encountered plenty of Irishmen in the NYPD and not all of them were dirty.
âMy first police partner was a man called John OâConnor and he was a righteous, God-fearing man and an excellent detective. But every time I complained about the corruption that was going on he would say, âFrank, you canât keep chipping away at the foundation with nothing to replace itâ and I would say, âJohn, until the whole structure falls down and we start from the beginning, nothing is going to changeâ.âÂ
Before winding the clock all the way back, what about the big policing issue today in the US? On April 21, former police officer Derek Chauvin was convicted of the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis. The verdict represented the first conviction for murder by a police officer of a black person, despite a whole raft of cases across the country in which African-Americans have been shot dead by cops in suspicious circumstances.Â

Serpico welcomes the verdict, but isnât confident that it signifies change.
âI think itâs a drop in the bucket,â he says. âPeople will say weâre turning a corner now because his own buddies testified against him.Â
âNobody can take another manâs life and not be accountable. And yet this is what we have had (before now). Unless you are black you cannot imagine what they have been going through their whole lives. This is what has to change.âÂ
Racism among police has always been a sore on the American landscape, but at different periods of history it has taken different forms. Were cops as quick to use lethal action against minorities back in Serpicoâs day?
âThe racism was different then,â he says. âThey had what they called the goon squad to rough up people. We (the NYPD) didnât shoot people the way they do today but it was there in different ways.
âI was once on my way to work when I rescued two families and their dog during a fire. I climbed onto the second-floor landing and got them out. Nobody was really injured except me. I had smoke inhalation. And then my lieutenant comes along and I tell him, âSir I just did thisâ. And he said go and put your uniform on. I never got the slightest recognition for it and you know why? Because the families were black. If they had been white the mayor would have given me a medal.âÂ
Serpico began life in Brooklyn, the youngest son of Italian immigrants. Growing up, he loved the local cops and the stories on the radio about detectives. Wearing the uniform was what it was about for him. At the age of 17 he enlisted in the US army and served in South Korea for two years, and travelled a bit, including to the land of his parents.Â
When he returned he enrolled in college and worked as a youth counsellor and other jobs before signing up for the NYPD.
He started work with the force in September 1959, assigned as a patrolman. From there he moved into plainclothes undercover work and did so throughout Manhattan, Brooklyn, and The Bronx. He didnât fit the prototype cop of the era, with his hippie sensibilities and a fondness for classical music and opera. He lived down in the Village, where he didnât let on he was a cop.Â
In the neighbourhood, they knew him as Paco. On the street, Serpico could police with the best of them. His zealousness for the job saw him make arrests even when he was off-duty, or had spotted a crime outside his own precinct district.
Pretty soon, he came across the corruption. It was organised and widespread and, to a large extent, amounted to a protection racket.
âThey went around to the underworld and collected for police protection,â he says. âIt was called the pad.âÂ
Everybody got a cut but straight away Serpico said heâd no interest in taking the money. That set him apart, made some of his fellow cops uncomfortable.
the movie skillfully portrays how he came upon the racket and how he became increasingly frustrated as it superseded the basic business of policing, the job that he loved doing.
âIn the movie, my partner and I are chasing this big Black hulk of a man into a house and then heâs hiding under a stairwell. We find him on his knees and my partner takes out his gun and starts hassling him,â Serpico remembers.
âMy partner was complaining because the man was late on his pay-off. And he says to him, âYou son of a bitch, if youâre late again âŠand heâs poking the man on his mouth with a gun. And the man says, âPlease give me timeâ and my partner says, âIâll give you all the time you want with life in prisonâ.âÂ
Serpico was observing this criminality close up and it was interfering with his capacity to do the job. More than that though, it was wrong.Â
And for this Italian American there was no grey area between right and wrong when it came to cops shaking down criminals.
By 1967, he was moving to do something about it.Â
Assisted by a colleague, David Dunk, whom heâd known from his earliest days in the force, he tried to get the top brass to tackle the problem. Repeatedly, the honest cops hit brick walls. They went to a contact of Durkâs in the mayorâs office but, despite assurances, nothing came of it.Â
This went on four years, during which time Serpico was growing increasingly disillusioned, trying to continue with frontline policing, looking away when his colleagues were taking cash, struggling with the idea that the cops were the good guys.
Eventually, he and Durk took the decision to go outside the force.Â
In 1971, the published a series of articles after the pair went to reporter David Burnham. The news reports were sensational, charging that âpolicemen in the city are receiving millions of dollars in graft and that top police officials and members of mayor John V Lindsayâs staff ignored specific allegations of grafting.âÂ
Lindsay appointed a veteran Irish-American, Patrick V Murphy, as commissioner to tackle the corruption. Murphyâs parents, both natives of Cork, had met and married at home before crossing the Atlantic and settling in Brooklyn.Â
He got to work cleaning up the force. Many regard him as the man who did get to the bottom of the grafting, but Serpico doesnât remember him in such fond terms.
âHe tried to belittle me,â Serpico says.Â
Pretty soon, word spread through the NYPD that Serpico was the man behind the press headlines. He was transferred to narcotics, which he enjoyed because it allowed him to expand his experience. Meanwhile, Lindsay set up the Knapp Commission to examine the corruption allegations and Murphy got cracking on a cleanout.
Then we come to the dirty night in Brooklyn when Serpico is one of a group of cops acting on a tip-off to hunt down a drug dealer. They had an address in an apartment block and they approached the door. Somebody suggested that Serpico knock on the door as he spoke Spanish and the suspect was Hispanic. Serpico rapped on the door, it opened and he barged towards it but there was an attempt to shut it. He was jammed now, pushing against the door. He took out his weapon. His fellow cops stood back and let him at it.
His colleague radioed for medical assistance, but even this was done in a way that was careless at best, intent on delaying medical assistance at worst.
âThere was no 10.13 call, which is highest priority, it means a man is down. The call was 10.10 which means shots fired and so they never called for a backup. They thought I was going to die. They expected me to die.âÂ
He spent a month in hospital recovering and was left with some wounds, including deafness in his left ear.
They gave him his detectiveâs shield, which he has to this day.Â
Later, he testified before the Knapp Commission, telling the members that âthe atmosphere does not yet exist in which an honest police officer can act without fear or ridicule or reprisal from his fellow officers".Â
The commission eventually reported that major corruption did exist and structures were put in place to keep the cops honest. For Serpicoâs career, that all came too late.Â
When he came out of hospital, he retired on a disability pension due to his wounds.Â
The movie ends with him leaving his home in the Village bound for Switzerland. In real life, thatâs what he did. He stayed there and travelled throughout Europe for the best part of 10 years.
He also co-operated on his biography with Peter Haas. The book sold three million copies and was adapted for the movie. The royalties ensured that Serpico wouldnât have to work again.
In 1974, he returned to New York briefly to endorse for US attorney general Ramsey Clark in a run for the senate. Serpico placed great faith in Clark as a man of integrity and they became firm friends.Â
In 2003, Clark came to Ireland to give evidence at the trial in Ennis, Co Clare, of activist Mary Kelly, who had damaged US planes in Shannon. The retired politician testified that the US had been engaged in a war in Iraq and Kellyâs action were justified. Kelly was convicted nonetheless, but the conviction was overturned on appeal.
Serpico didnât know about Clarkâs intervention in the Irish trial.
âItâs good to hear that,â he says. âRamsey passed away recently. He was one of my best friends, a man of the highest integrity. I even produced a documentary a few years back called .âÂ
And what did he think of the movie? âI took issue with the director Sidney Lumet so I walked out in frustration,â he says.Â
The problem occurred in the shooting of a scene in which a racist cop chases a black man and shoves his head down a toilet. Serpico, on set, shouted âcutâ. He said that never happened. The director didnât want him on the set after that.Â
And what about himself and Pacino?

âI got on well with Al (Pacino). The problem was he overacted. I donât know if he was doing it or whether he was following the direction of Lumet.âÂ
Down through the years, Serpico has continued to stand with those fighting injustice. He left policing at a young age, but the sense of right and wrong that prompted him to enter the force in the first place has never left him. Whistleblowers seek him out. Groups intent on police reform use him as a sounding board. He has got involved in protecting the environment from rampant development.Â
The fire still burns.
âIâve been blessed,â he says.Â
He talks with some passion about the dandelion, the flower that some dismiss as a weed, its beauty, its power in a world where nature is so often dismissed and abused.Â
And then, finally, he gets back to his other passion, the one that defined his life. They were at it back when he was a young cop, those who will abuse power, prey on the weak, smother light with their dark motives. They are still at it today as far as Frank Serpico is concerned.
âThey wonât leave me alone,â he says. âThatâs why we have to keep fighting.â Â
âOne time we were out at my rented beach house in Montauk. We were sitting there looking at the water. And I thought, Well, I might as well be like everybody else and ask a silly question, which was, "Why, Frank? Why did you do it?"Â
He said, "Well, Al, I don't know. I guess I have to say it would be because...if I didn't, who would I be when I listened to a piece of music?" I mean, what a way of putting it! That's the kind of guy he was. I enjoyed being with him. There was mischief in his eyes.âÂ







![Johnny_Stephens_Photography-02-425A6831-Edit[1].jpg Restaurant review: The Ivy Asia is an assault on all five senses â I hated it](/cms_media/module_img/9752/4876311_6_teasersmall_Johnny_Stephens_Photography-02-425A6831-Edit_5b1_5d.jpg)