Outside the box: Bishop of Elphin & Being Gay or Female
First, let us reflect on how many different groups of people he has offended, all crammed into a single radio interview. That takes some doing. Given the bishopâs own lifestyle choices â celibate, childless, and definitely not female (his Church doesnât do gender equality) â what does he know about the subjects upon which he so blithely opined?
Letâs start with how gay couples with children âare not parentsâ. Who can verify this claim? Perhaps children being raised by gay parents. There are loads of them where I live. I start with two teenager boys, whose mums shared everything, including a pregnancy each. âYour parents are not your parentsâ, I suggest. They laugh. Loudly. As though I have said something so bizarre itâs funny. A straw poll â a quick ask-around of my childrenâs friends from same-sex families â suggests that such an idea is laughable, were it not so cack-handedly offensive.
And so we move on to comparing being gay with having Downâs syndrome or spina bifida. Because, yes, this is what the bishop said. The key words here are the verbs; note the distinction between âbeingâ and âhavingâ. You are gay, you have Downâs syndrome or spina bifida. But your sexuality, if it is not heterosexuality, is a disability, a condition, says the bishop. A âhavingâ, not a âbeingâ. And just as you are picking yourself up from the floor, he slams home another: being gay is ânot what God intended.â
Really? And how does the Bishop know this? Has he been hearing voices? Does he have a secret email address for this invisible deity? A phone line nobody knows about? Have they been texting? Is God on Snapchat? Or perhaps the bishop is merely manipulating peopleâs spiritual beliefs to perpetrate outmoded bigotry. Lots of people believe in God, as is their right. Lots of people donât believe in God, as is also their right. What is nobodyâs right is to speak on behalf of something that may or may not exist, in order to spread prejudice and divisiveness.
But did the bishop finish there? Oh no. Heâd offended gay people, now it was womenâs turn. Speaking about terminating rape pregnancies (because celibate, childless men know ALL about how that feels), he suggested that âyou donât destroy a life in order to get back at the motherâs rapist.â And there it is. FFS. A woman who has been made pregnant through rape is not a âmotherâ. And what arrogance to suggest a woman wishing to recover from the trauma of rape is âgetting backâ at the rapist, in some childish tit-for-tat. There! Thatâll teach you! Oh, wait. Youâre a rapist. That this kind of homophobia and misogyny is still given the time of day, in 2015, is not doing Ireland, or anyone in it, any favours. Desist, bishop.
Do your flock a favour and take a vow of silence.







