Colin Sheridan: Ed Sheeran’s ‘neutrality’ over Macklemore and Gaza is a political choice

Colin Sheridan says that wealth and influence bring greater responsibility when powerful industries punish artists for speaking out
Nobody needs Ed Sheeran’s political philosophy. I would happily live without it. What I cannot accept is the proposition that a man who has become fabulously wealthy within the music industry can watch its powerful figures punish another artist for saying 'Free Palestine', continue as before, and call his own position neutrality.

Nobody needs Ed Sheeran’s political philosophy. I would happily live without it. What I cannot accept is the proposition that a man who has become fabulously wealthy within the music industry can watch its powerful figures punish another artist for saying 'Free Palestine', continue as before, and call his own position neutrality.

If, as many great artists have tried to tell us, all good art is political, then Ed Sheeran’s music is terrible.

This is my personal opinion, of course, and Sheeran has been dividing opinions long before he declared not having any of his own. The amount of turf in his shed tells one story, and that story is that he is richer than Solomon. 

You have reached your article limit. Already a subscriber? Sign in

Save €40 on an Annual Subscription.​

Continue reading within unlimited digital access and exclusive subscriber benefits.

Cancel anytime

More in this section

Revoiced

Newsletter

Had a busy week? Sign up for some of the best reads from the week gone by. Selected just for you.

Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited