Leveson-type inquiry needed
The fact that our âpolitical eliteâ are obfuscating at every turn about an inquiry and are only having their hands forced now by the revelations of recent days is so inexplicable that one wonders if they are really that stupid or is there some other agenda? Seeking to find out the truth can hardly be politically unpopular for even the most cowardly of public figures. As a citizen and taxpayer, I want to know what happened in all the bailed out banks, from the bottom to the top.
Considering it has taken five years for our âpolitical eliteâ to even consider an inquiry, then no reasonable person can have any confidence in one held by the Oireachtas. Nor can anyone be enthusiastic at the idea of a repetition of the inquiries we have had in the past 20 years, which were ruinously costly in terms of time and money. What is required is a Leveson-type inquiry led by a High Court judge (or some other suitably-independent and respected person) with the central goal to get to the truth as soon as possible.
Finally, the suggestion that any inquiry must wait for the conclusion of the trials of certain persons is a fallacy. If it is feared that potential jurors will be influenced to such an extent there cannot be fair trials, then the answer is simple: refer such trials to the Special Criminal Court. Why should it be good enough for alleged paramilitaries and organised criminals, but not so for the sacred cows of Irish banking?
Of course, the chances of this coming to pass, of any wrongdoers being prosecuted expeditiously, of a balance being struck between the rights of the individual to due process and the rights of the citizenry to justice is, given our âpolitical eliteâ, zero. They are like the government of the Ançien RĂ©gime of pre-revolutionary France of whom Winston Churchill said in his âHistory of the English-Speaking Peoplesâ: â âThey could neither work the machine nor would they alter it.â




