We should reform Oireachtas rather than cut benefits to needy

The British Prime Minister David Cameron is attempting some spectacular reform in the House of Lords.

Why isn’t our Taoiseach looking for some real savings through similar reform, as promised, in our Government and quango circles?

It would be a noble lead and a more feasible means of raising some of the necessary funds than heeding IMF mission chief to Ireland Craig Beaumont as he pressurises the Government to cut dole, medical cards and child benefits.

Allowing this outside intrusion on the young, sick and elderly is a disgrace.

For a start, based on international standards less than 60 TDs are necessary in Ireland.

Amending the Constitution, to provide one representative for every 30,000 to 40,000 of population from the current 20,000 to 30,000 people would reduce the number of deputies from 160 to an even figure of 100.

This initial move towards reform would cut Government expenditure in salaries and expenses alone by around €15m annually. Local councils could take up the slack in providing reliable grassroot feedback.

The Programme for Government formed in Mar 2011 promised to abolish the Seanad as part of a broader programme of Constitutional reform.

It must be acknowledged, with its 60 senators, it is just a remnant of the old ascendancy’s House of Lords — a luxury we can ill afford.

Abolish it by the next general election and save the country another €15m in salaries and expenses. I recollect having heard a sum of €190m mooted as the amount saved by getting rid of this Upper House.

Nobody is being sacked. They can all compete for the Dáil if selected, next time round and the cream will surface.

What’s good for the goose is good for the gander!

James Gleeson

Thurles

Co Tipperary