Northern Ireland needs to move beyond an examination of the past, says Donaldson

DUP leader Jeffrey Donaldson:'We need some form of process that recognises the suffering of many, the injustice that many feel in Northern Ireland.' Picture: Liam McBurney/PA
DUP leader Jeffrey Donaldson has said society in Northern Ireland needs to move âbeyond an examination of the pastâ.
He was speaking following the collapse of high-profile legacy cases, and reports that the UK Government will seek an amnesty for Troubles-era killings.
The Public Prosecution Service announced on Friday that the case against Soldier F for the murders of James Wray and William McKinney on Bloody Sunday in Londonderry in 1972 will not proceed.
The prosecution of another veteran, Soldier B, for the murder of 15-year-old Daniel Hegarty in Derry later in 1972, will also not proceed, the PPS said.
Mr Donaldson said a system is needed which recognises the injustices that happened in the Troubles, to allow people to move on.
He told
: âI think we need a process that moves us from where we are to where we can finally say, well, look, weâve examined the past, we have given people the opportunity to explore whether there is the prospect of prosecutions against those whoâve murdered their loved ones.âAnd then, yes, we need to move to the next phase of the peace process.
âWe need to move our society beyond an examination of the past, to the kind of reconciliation and healing that we desire to see in Northern Ireland.
âSo we need some form of process that recognises the suffering of many, the injustice that many feel in Northern Ireland.
âI donât think you can pull a veil over that. I donât think you could ignore that.
âI think that, if weâre going to have healing, we need to have recognition and acknowledgement.â
Justice Minister Naomi Long has called for clarity from the British Government on proposals to introduce a stature of limitations on legacy killings.
She said: âIt would be a de facto amnesty for everyone who committed those offences during the Troubles.
âIt may be where the British Government is taking the process, but it certainly isnât where Alliance stands.
âWe believe that it is right that, where the evidence is available and the prosecutorial test is met, that people should have access to justice.
âBecause I firmly believe that, by denying people access to justice, we will create further grievance further hurt, and further division in our community.
âI think that thatâs a huge risk.
âI also donât believe that it will be human rights compliant, because, under Article Two, I cannot see how, without the full consent of the entire community, youâre able to avoid the prosecutorial part of this process.â

Ms Long also said it should not be taken as read that other prosecutions will fail because of the outcome in the Bloody Sunday cases.
She told BBCâs Sunday Politics: âWe have always known that there will be a limited number of historic cases that will be able to be successfully prosecuted at this remove, due to the passing of witnesses, due to the processes of the time, and due to the lack of evidence.
âBut that does not equate to justifying saying that no case, even where there are all of those things in place, should be able to make its way to the courts.
âThatâs a fundamental difference that we need to bear in mind.
âBecause if a family know that there is the evidence, the witnesses, and it makes the evidential threshold, to deny them the right to take their case to court, I think, would be entirely wrong.â
Ms Long said the basis for forthcoming talks between the British and Irish Governments on legacy issues is not clear.
âWe need clarity on that,â she said. âWe have already gone through this process and arrived at the Stormont House Agreement.â